I have on the host machine two network interfaces. One is lan and the other is a wlan. For libvirt I have created a nat network which is bound to the wlan. From the guest I can access other machines in the network host wlan is connected to. Also DNS lookup works. The problem is that there’s no connection to the internet at all, e.g. pinging something gives “Destination network unreachable”. This only happens when both network connection on the host are active. Running qemu/libvirt on OpenSuse Tumbleweed.
The nat network in question:
<network>
<name>natToWlan</name>
<uuid>a44c939c-e6bf-44d0-8f86-376056d418a4</uuid>
<forward dev="wlp19s0f4u1u1" mode="nat">
<nat>
<port start="1024" end="65535"/>
</nat>
<interface dev="wlp19s0f4u1u1"/>
</forward>
<bridge name="virbr1" stp="on" delay="0"/>
<mac address="52:54:00:1f:64:95"/>
<ip address="192.168.100.1" netmask="255.255.255.0">
<dhcp>
<range start="192.168.100.128" end="192.168.100.254"/>
</dhcp>
</ip>
</network>
This only happens when both network connection on the host are active.
I’m not a networking expert by any means but this seems like a pretty strong hint that it’s a routing issue.
Check the routing tables on the host? I’d bet that the internet is only reachable on the LAN interface (again, not an expert but one of them has to take priority, right?). I’m guessing that disconnecting the LAN interface changes the routing to go through the WLAN interface instead.
You could possibly add a static route to work around this: https://libvirt.org/formatnetwork.html#static-routes
Your routing table on the host changes when you have both networks active because the OS is preferring the NIC I’m guessing. You’re using a static config for only one interface here.
Either switch to a static setup for NIC and Wlan, or create two interfaces for the VM that cover both host interfaces. A simpler setup would be host networking (macvtap) vs a bridged nat with only one path.
This sounds reasonable. Curiously now that I tried again with both host lan & wlan active there was no problem. I have a hunch the routing depends on which interface networkmanger starts first.
$route Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface default 192.168.102.1 0.0.0.0 UG 600 0 0 wlp19s0f4u1u1 default RT-AC86U-6D60 0.0.0.0 UG 20100 0 0 enp15s0 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 100 0 0 enp15s0 192.168.100.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 virbr1 192.168.102.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 600 0 0 wlp19s0f4u1u1 192.168.122.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 virbr0_
This is not great practice. You should get a dedicated Ethernet card for wlan and then block list the device on the host. The way your doing it is a little more complicated and is a security risk if the VM stops running for some reason.
Have an idea which might solve this.
- Change the vm net config to NOT bind to specific host interface
- Change host networks so that there’s only one default route (lan)
- Add routing to host that all traffic which goes to 192.168.102.x goes through the host wlan connection
deleted by creator
-
Your wlan
-
Your home lan
-
The internet
That makes three networks. Not two.
First, think about the way from the internet to your home lan. Is there NAT happening? Is there a DHCP server?
And then on the way from lan to wlan your server is doing NAT and DHCP again.
That doubling of NAT and/or DHCP is probably creating trouble.
-
deleted by creator
When the host routing table is like this:
$route Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface default 192.168.102.1 0.0.0.0 UG 600 0 0 wlp19s0f4u1u1 default RT-AC86U-6D60 0.0.0.0 UG 20100 0 0 enp15s0the VM has internet connection. If the defaults are the other way around it doesn’t.
