• thingsiplay@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Wayland kinda is an x.org project in the first place.

    Not really. Wayland is fundamentally different from Xorg. Otherwise we would not need Wayland and create X12. It’s like saying mechanical hard drives are kind of Solid State Drives, just because they allow to do something similar. Even if the developers are the same, does not mean the technology is.

    AFAIK it’s officially organised under freedesktop but the core devs are x.org people.

    I’m not sure if this is correct. But let’s assume this is correct. Why does it matter? If Wayland was developed by different people than those who maintain Xorg at the moment, would not change the fact that we need Wayland, because it is different and solves issues that cannot be solved with Xorg without rewriting it. And nobody wants to rewrite Xorg or understand the code (other than very basic security maintenance).

    • barsoap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      And nobody wants to rewrite Xorg or understand the code (other than very basic security maintenance).

      That’s precisely the point: All the devs got tired of it and started wayland instead.

      X12 might happen at some point when wayland is mature, as in a “let’s create and bless a network-transparent protocol so we might have a chance of getting rid of XWayland in 50 years” kind of move.