YouTube has been spotted testing server-side ads, which could pose a problem to ad blockers.

    • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      5 months ago

      Support candidates who want to limit the ability for large tech companies to acquire their competitors. Maybe even those that wish to see their acquisitions rolled back. Maybe even those that wish to see them broken up.

    • QuadratureSurfer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      5 months ago

      Grayjay has been useful for that. I still follow people on YouTube, but if they setup a channel anywhere else I can switch my feed to draw from those sources instead.

    • orcrist@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      The alternatives are around now, and we know that many YouTube content creators are exploring other revenue streams, so it’ll be interesting to see how exodus works. Clearly YouTube is going to continue to get worse and some people are going to leave. What’s next? I’m excited.

      It’s always interesting to watch companies implode. Apparently Reddit is blocking non-Google search engines from indexing them, and Twitter wants you to be logged in to view people’s profiles. Those types of moves guarantee that the platform won’t be relevant a decade from now and possibly sooner than that.

    • Max Günther@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Piped. It uses SponsorBlock to also skip ads by the creator in the video, I am very sure they will update it to remove ads injected by YouTube as well. It is also very privacy-friendly.