• refalo@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    $700 for an N100 tablet? Yikes. I can’t imagine they would sell enough to stay in business.

    • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I would think it’s hard to stay in business promoting Linux-first products as it is, and the higher price is because they know they will sell fewer units, and so they need to recoup a higher per-unit cost to functionally stay in business.

      I agree that the price seems a bit absurdly high, but finding a quality Linux tablet of any type seems pretty dicey as it is.

      EDIT: https://pine64.com/product/pinetab2-10-1-4gb-64gb-linux-tablet-with-detached-backlit-keyboard/

      For example, this Linux tablet from Pine64 is more affordable, but with a Rockchip RK3566 it’s just way underpowered compared to the N100, and that’s over $200. Further, the Pine64 seems restricted to 64gb eMMC while the Juno Tab 3 can be upgraded to 2tb storage with its M.2 slot. I see no mention of an M.2 slot for the Pine64 Tablet. This genuinely seems like a more fully featured tablet compared to other available Linux-first tablets.

      • rotopenguin@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 months ago

        The PineTab doesn’t even have a wifi/bt radio that’s supported by its own OS. When you’re an OEM and you’re choosing what chips you’re putting in a design, I think you should stick to chips that are usable. Chips where the manufacturer has written specs and maybe even a driver that transforms “a piece of glass with a lead frame” into something with a purpose.

        Anyway, that’s just how I feel.

  • ColdWater@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    “Celeron N100” for 700$? That’s absurd, you can get a Raspberry pi tablet for way less and if you want x86 there are cheaper alternatives, maybe they’re just a small team and assemble everything by hand that might explain the high price but 700$ is a little high

    • lps@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      3 months ago

      That’s the linux tax again…w a free OS no less 🤦‍♂️

        • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Right, the point they’re making is that the Linux devices are more costly, despite having a free OS, compared to cheap Android tablets, for instance. It’s a markup that Linux-first devices can’t avoid because they just can’t sell as many devices (because Linux is less popular), so they have to go with a higher per-unit price up front to recoup costs and make a profit.

          They lack the economies of scale that allow them to be sold for cheaper.

      • mariah@feddit.rocks
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        I use it. Its not great. The touchscreen will freeze randomly requiring a reboot. Sometimes just a reboot isn’t enough. U have to unplug it, shut down, then it’ll work. Its good otherwise. I can run 100 minecraft mods just fine

  • solrize@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    This seems terrible. You can get a nice laptop for a lot less, including some that you can configure as a tablet, e.g. Lenovo Yoga.

    • Qkall@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      So I’m like a week in… but I bought an ‘p8 mini laptop’ off ebay as it found a sale cheaper than aliexpress… but i’m loving it. n100, 12gb ram and 512gb hd. amaa

      Necro edit - forgot to mention I got it for 330 pulse shipping

      • 7eter@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        Did you had any troubles with the hardware? Did the touchscreen work out of the box and which OS?

        • Qkall@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          The only things that aren’t working out of box are autorotating the screen and when the device boots up it seems to want to display the login screen on a screen other than the default. A simple closing the lid, waiting for it to sleep and reopening the screen fixes this. Or if you have an external monitor it’ll output there by default. I feel like the latter could easily be fixed as it feels like I need to default it do the correct screen and I suspect it’s picking up the touch screen device as the display… It shows up on the battery settings as a display with a discharging battery for some reason. The auto rotating doesn’t bother me… I prefer having explicit control of the rotation for my needs.

          I’m using endeavoros with plasma 6

        • Qkall@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          so i have’t really gotten to test this hard but seems like 4ish to 6ish hrs of work… It does get a lil warm but I have my plasma settings to change cpu gov on power events and that really helps… i think i could get more if I switched to sway or something. It suspends really well with only loosing a percent or two overnight and hibernating works.