• EatATaco@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    That links says only a quarter did it because they wanted people to quit, so it suggests that chances are this is not the reason Amazon is doing it…and you’re posting while claiming it factually proves this is their motivation? Pretty deceiving.

    • draughtcyclist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      I personally read this as “one quarter admit they did it to get people to quit”. If you think these folks are always transparent and honest, think again. They’re just trying to say whatever gets them the least amount of bad PR

      This is effectively a layoff without benefits.

      • EatATaco@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        3 months ago

        Your position hinges on the survey not being anonymous. I clicked through and found nothing that claims it was not anonymous, and these things are normally done anonymously for exactly the reason you point out: less honesty.

        Do you have anything to back this up or is it simply that holding this belief helps confirm what you already believe to be true?