PV = Photovoltaic

  • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    98
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    At least for right now it’s just a test on a 100-meter length of track, but this reeks of a startup trying to innovate its way out of NIMBYs not wanting to put solar panels where they actually belong without considering why nobody has put solar panels in the middle of a railroad track before (cough rocks, dust, wildlife, vibration, and vandalism cough).

    PV Magazine is neat for reading about potential new innovations, but one thing I really dislike about it is that it basically just regurgitates what solar companies say about themselves in press releases in a way that’s completely uncritical. For instance:

    Similarly, removal and installation tests will be carried out to demonstrate that the Sunways pilot installation is perfectly adapted to the constraints related to maintenance work and the operation of the line.

    • The Pantser@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      2 months ago

      One more reason. The reason they tell people not to lay on the tracks under the train, the freaking cables and chains that could come loose and dangle under the cars and drag along the ground that would cut you in half the long way. Those loose parts would just destroy the solar panels.

      • Zement@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Maybe they only put them on the “Off Road” Tracks of the Street Trains. They usually have a covered bottom (like Cars) to avoid debris flinging into its soft parts… but that will only solve one Issue of the many MANY there are. (Lots of Ifs here)

    • warm@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Solar panels need to be on every home and how new builds in many countries still don’t require them baffles me.

      • Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 months ago

        Might be cause they make roof redos or fumigation even more expensive. I had a customer say they were paying 3k to get their panels removed so they could pay another 3k to fumigate the house. Almost doubled the price.

        Don’t get me wrong, I agree that we should require panels in new builds somehow but I don’t know what the best option is.

        • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Why did they have to remove the panels in order to fumigate? If the company couldn’t work around them then they should have found a different company.

          • Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            2 months ago

            You drop heavy ass tarps on the roof and roll them to tent a house, I’m taking couple hundred pound tarps. The workers need to be able to walk on the roof to set them up, the tarps can and have damaged panels so companies in the area don’t fumigate with them on anymore.

            I work closely with a fumigation company and that’s what they’ve told us.

            • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              2 months ago

              Seems like they could use a boom lift and work around them if they wanted to. I’m sure there’s a way to cover the panels with plywood to where they wouldn’t get damaged. Much cheaper and easier than removing and replacing.

              • Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                2 months ago

                You would need to screw the plywood into the roof so it doesn’t shift around and damage stuff during the whole process, nobody is gonna wanna do that. Boom lifts are ocassionally used for extremely tall properties but they add to the price. You’re forgetting the biggest issue though, liability. My company stopped doing fumigations cause of the liability involved. Getting the plywood on the roof is gonna take a lot of effort and more than just a boom lift, you’re gonna need huge slabs of it to properly cover panels, I don’t know if you’ve seen them but they’re not small. They usually cover significant portions of the roof.

                At that point it would just be cheaper to pay a company to remove them and reinstall vs all that other effort.

                If there was a better way the companies would do it to make money. There just isn’t unless the owner is willing to shell out and many aren’t, even the rich ones and we work with A LOT of rich people. They own million dollar homes and have multiple homes all over the area.

        • warm@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Sounds like a scam. Houses round me had their roof tiles replaced recently and the guys just took the solar panels off and put them back on after no problem without inflating the price. Perhaps it varies on how the panels are installed, but most I have seen are just under the tiles and attached to the roof frame.

          And the benefits far out weigh the slight extra cost of a roof retile every 20 or so years.

        • warm@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          The cost of solar panels on a new build is extremely marginal for the long term benefits they provide to the owners of the house, the environment and the general electric grid. They should absolutely be a requirement.

          • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            They paid back in around 5 years on my moms roof, and that was 11 years ago, and panels are waaay cheaper now than they were back then.

          • nooneescapesthelaw@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Yeah your right, my only concern is them having a captive market which would allow them to jack up prices but right now there are lots of competing companies so it shouldn’t happen withing the next decade

  • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Why not just make solar roofs over things like parking lots and sidewalks? That way it can provide cover and power, you can use off the shelf panels, and they are unlikely to get damaged.

  • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m interested to see how this turns out, because I’m thinking this would significantly increase maintenance costs on those panels due to rocks being kicked up, vibration from the train, etc.

    • TheRealCharlesEames@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 months ago

      Maybe it’s like a blanket that the train picks up over its head and runs underneath, setting it back down on the ground after it

    • catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      There shouldn’t be any rocks kicked up because the trains should stay on the rails, not touch the ballast.

      But dirt, debris, and brake dust will absolutely collect very quickly. Maybe they’re counting on rain to keep them clean.

      • JimmyMcGill@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        There’s still massive amounts of air pressure changes Those can definitely lift some smaller rocks

      • Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        They are saying in their FAQ that there are some brushes they can mount on the tails of trains running overhead. Can’t see any published picture of them though.

        Comment garantir la propreté des panneaux ?

        Il est vrai que des panneaux sales produisent moins et ce problème se vérifie également sur les toits des maisons ou dans le désert. Cependant, pour ce qui des panneaux placés entre les rails, il existe des systèmes de nettoyage, sous forme de brosse cylindrique, qui se place en queue de train et qui procède au nettoyage automatique des panneaux lorsque le train passe au-dessus. Ce dispositif garantit un rendement maximal des panneaux à un coût minime.

    • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      This isn’t nearly that dumb, because the train isn’t actually riding directly on top of the solar cells.

      • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’s close though, random shit gets dragged, kicked, dropped, etc all the time by trains.

        A chain , cable, or wire comes loose on a car and goodbye panels and like all of them …

        • barsoap@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          If a chain, cable, or wire comes loose on a car then the panels are the least of anyone’s worries. Also expect emergency brakes to kick in automatically. This is a train, not a bicycle.

        • Pilferjinx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 months ago

          I don’t why they don’t overhang them on frames. It’d cost more upfront, but hell alot cheaper than replacing the broken panels all the time.

        • daddy32@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          They could pair that with sensors / cameras for hanging things. These are already being produced and installed on tracks.

      • realharo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        But still, what is the point of this? What problem does this solve? It’s not like solar power deployment is bottlenecked by a lack of space to put the panels.

        This just makes it more expensive and more difficult to maintain for no reason.

        • Chronographs@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Honestly if they’re using the power lines for the train and a cleaning attachment on the train I can see it.

    • DannyBoy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yeah, I looked up the French solar roadways after seeing this to see the headline of ‘total disaster’. So as expected.

      • ZMonster@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Lamps were “total disasters” until they weren’t. Crosswalks even. Toilets in Seattle.

        There are lots of things that were “total disasters” at one point but were developed into safe reliable things. That’s not a reason to abandon an endeavor entirely, but a great reason to redirect or refine it.

        Also, headlines are not news, and most non-electrical engineers, let alone journalists, know jack fucking shit about electrical engineering. EEVBlog did a great few videos about solar roadways and their flaws.

    • Badabinski@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      I was looking for this comment so I can vent my extreme irritation to the world.

      God, can this concept please die already‽ If you want to put solar panels where the cars/trains are, just 👏 fucking 👏 put 👏 them 👏 on 👏 top👏

      Do not put them on the ground where they will get smushed and covered in dust and snow and dirt. do not. Just make a little roof for the train tracks/road/bike path/sidewalk/game trail/snail raceway and then put the panels on top of the roof and then if you’re feeling fancy angle the panels to point towards the sun and if you’re feeling really quite fancy then you can use bifacial panels to capture the backscatter from the ground and shit and then we can all be happy. solar ground no, solar roof yes, ground no roof yes. do not play the trolley problem with solar panels on the railroad tracks. we have been doing solar energy for decades and have fucking minmaxed this shit so why are they still trying to do this just STOP.

      Fuck.

      Person I’m responding to, please know that none of this is directed at you. I’m just sour right now and should get off the internet.

      • Valmond@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 months ago

        Solar parkings!! Park your car over solar panels!! Solar pools, put them at the bottom of your pool!! Put them INSIDE!

        It’s like an idiot manically obsessed with solar panels got their hands on some heavy drugs.

  • blady_blah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    2 months ago

    My first reaction was how stupid this is. Dirt, debris and other things will get on the panels and cause lots of problems, but after a few minutes I realized it’s actually quite brilliant.

    There are three major costs of solar, the panels, the location, and the wiring + inverters. If the tracks are used as the wires (extremely low resistance paths back to an inverter), the location is wasted space so basically free, and the inverter can be placed anywhere along the path to remove the power from the tracks, the cost of this comes down to mainly the cost of the panel, which is actually pretty cheep these days.

    The real challenges will be in cleaning & maintenance, vandalism, and modifying the track to limit the conductive paths (assuming they’re used for this).

    • If the tracks are used as the wires

      They’re not. Swiss rails are extra made so that you can walk over them. All electricity goes overhead for security reasons. If anything, they would probably tap into this overhead-grid.

      cleaning & maintenance

      possibly. But I can very easily imagine specialized trains cleaning them once every day

      vandalism

      not really a problem here in switzerland

      modifying the track to limit the conductive paths (assuming they’re used for this).

      They’re most likely not used for this. All electricity is overhead for security reasons, routing solar energy through the rails would destroy that. Doing that (beyond the 100m test-track) would mean a prolongued political discussion.

      • DempstersBox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        So I have a solar setup-older panels, like 15 years old. They can be 3/4 obscured by a building or whatever, and still make 85% of what they’re rated to.

        Which is fucking awesome. Right now, they’re covered in so much dust I can see the ‘clean’ spots where the morning dew condensed on them, and they’re still kicking 20 amps, about 15 more than I actually need.

        Daily cleaning? Way excessive. Monthly? Maybe, probably less. Not a whole lot going on in between rails.

        I’d be way more worried about tweakers trying to steal the wiring

      • blady_blah@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        All electricity is overhead for security reasons, routing solar energy through the rails would destroy that. Doing that (beyond the 100m test-track) would mean a prolongued political discussion.

        Electricity is overhead for safety reasons (maybe that’s what you meant by “security reasons”). As long as the voltage is kept low (< 48V) and the runs of solar panels aren’t too long, the power can be run safely in the tracks.

    • DempstersBox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      The cleanliness of the panels isn’t actually as big a deal as it’s made out to be. Like yeah, they can’t be completely obscured, but you’d be surprised at how fucking filthy they can be and still make juice. Or half-or more- covered with trees, or other shade.

      Right now, my panels are covered in enough crap I really should hose them off, and they’re still kicking 20 amps. So ahhh… fuck it. Maybe it’ll rain and I won’t have to.

      Same with cloudy days-sometimes I get more power on cloudy days because the panels don’t get at hot. Hell, some streetlights put out enough light to harvest energy from-but they’re largely getting replaced with LED’s. Sad face?

      I expect with the type of traffic going on between rails, these will need vanishingly little maintenance. I hope it goes well

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      Standing next to trains as they pass, or on one’s with open decks, you’ll know they produce a lot of wind. I assume under the train this is even stronger, with a strong low pressure area. This should be able to clear most obstructions without an issue whenever a train passes. Sure, it’ll also toss more on, but there’s some equilibrium that it’ll reach and it shouldn’t ever get worse. My guess is that’s well before it is a major issue for the panels.

    • ATDA@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      Throw a few of those sexy lady mud flaps on the back of a train with a hose. Darn near auto squeegee!

  • DrunkEngineer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 months ago

    While I know things are generally more expensive in Switzerland, $685,000 is crazy expensive for just 18 kW (48 panels).

  • cobysev@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    This doesn’t seem like it would work. Debris falling off the trains, dusty buildup, vibrations, rocks bouncing around the tracks; heck, even just wildlife crossing the tracks. So many things are gonna damage those panels if they’re just lying on the ground between tracks, and solar panels are extremely fragile.

    I hope they have some sort of bullet proof glass or something over those panels. Probably going to need a special train to spray water over them to clean regularly, too.

    I dunno about Swiss trains, but the tracks behind my house in America leave a thick black film on everything, and it’s very hard to clean by hand. I think they transport coal.

  • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    Seems interesting. As far I know I think why not, as long as you place Dragging Equipment Detectors (example) before and after the installation areas. Seems a good a place as any for solar panels, especially on only occasionally frequented lines.