• Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Why not say that if you can’t build a railway system for 20$ then you should stick with the current system that is just so great?

    • CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Because you have to approach the two problems differently. If you want to support the expansion of railways, you’ll need political willpower.

      But if you’re an individual who needs a vehicle, wouldn’t the best choice be the most efficient one available?

      • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Using 1bn of gov money for car production isn’t political willpower?

        And political willpower is already finally literally building new rail. Why take that money away and back into cars?

        Also, the two issues; cars with or without solar panels, and solar panels on buildings are separate. And panels are ultra cheap.

        So cars with solar panels are more efficient simply bcs there is more solar palens that way, regardless of your building having panels or not.

        Every panel is a net positive, super effective or slightly less super effective ones.

        And you are not putting any more or less panels on your house if you buy a car with or without the 200$ solar panels on/in it.

        • CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          What government money? Aptera is privately funded. They’ve won some government grants but most of their funding is from investors. They’re not taking money away from rail projects.

          And even if we went all in on rail, what are we supposed to do in the years it takes to make the transition? Keep using ICE vehicles?

          • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Sorry, I didn’t see any other connection from when you said this:

            My point is just, what infrastructure can you do with say <$1b? It’s a lot of money but not building a whole new railroad kind of money. You can get a few station upgrade projects, a couple of electric trains, etc.

            There’s room for private funding of a new electric car company. Save the tax dollars for big infrastructure projects.

            My bad, but I don’t see the relevance otherwise - the tax dollars are already being saved & spent on big infrastructure projects, and the privately funded car company is also underway. Both are already facts.

            Nobody is getting rid of cars or making any transitions overnight. How did you come to this anyway?