• Telorand@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    107
    ·
    27 days ago

    Tldr, to help fight patent trolls:

    They’re asking you to find evidence of preexisting technology – referred to by patent lawyers as “prior art” – that can kill off bad patents. This could be open-source documentation (including release notes), published standards or specifications, product manuals, articles, blogs, books, or any publicly available information.

    They use this info to essentially undercut and invalidate the patent trolls’ filing, killing their ability to file suit on that patent again.

    There’s also a contest with a $3000 prize for anyone who can help kill a current one on their plate.

    https://patroll.unifiedpatents.com/contests/s3vQkRdTC6coNkjyx

    • stinky@redlemmy.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      26 days ago

      It sounds like they need proof that this tech existed before 2013? I’m new to patents… how does this evidence kill the patent?

  • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    27 days ago

    Imagine a society where people who generate value have to waste their energy fighting these shit stains.

    Congress wont do their jobs lol

    • Odelay42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      26 days ago

      Counterpoint: congress does their jobs exactly how their corporate owners want them to. Congress does not serve the best interests of the people.

      • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        26 days ago

        most normies aint ready for this reality, but you aint wrong.

        if we take facts based approach, ie just look at what they do, not what they say, this conclusion is self-evident.

  • JoYo 🇺🇸@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    27 days ago

    if you are known to look at patents then you become a target of patent trolls.

    i advise good OPSEC.

  • canadaduane@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    27 days ago

    I love this approach.

    Nit: “If you can find prior art that describes such a system before June 13, 2013, you could be a winner.” … 2013 is a typo I’m guessing?

    • jqubed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      27 days ago

      That’s not the submission deadline, that’s the priority date for this particular patent, basically when it was first filed. If people can find other published information describing what the patent covers that predates the filing it would help invalidate the patent.

  • How about we work to change how the patent office operates? I think it’s ridiculous you can get a patent for a thing that doesn’t actually fucking exist, among many other really stupid things they approve or deny.