• Kaidao@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    128
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hilarious that these subscription companies learned nothing from the cable industry that they’re disrupting

    • Candybar121@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      86
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I swear I’ve seen every single company from Netflix to Disney to Spotify to Youtube to Apple doing the same sort of thing in like the past 3 months. This is GROSS.

      • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        71
        ·
        1 year ago

        I can’t wait for their suprised pikachu faces when they put so much friction into using their products that piracy starts eating into their profits. Us nerds are already fed up, and when that happens piracy alternatives grow. That makes it that much easier for the general public to also sail the high seas. I give it 3 years or so before they’re all shocked and crying to congress about the problem they created

        • CmdrShepard@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          ·
          1 year ago

          Nah they’ll put out a bunch of news articles talking about how much money pirates are costing them. If they get enough public support or line the right pockets we might also see Congress crack down on this ‘scourge’ that’s probably totally linked to terrorism somehow and “must be dealt with swiftly.”

          • krakenx@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Sopa/pipa was the one and only time the American people beat the corporations+Congress. Don’t mess with our circuses is the one thing everyone agrees on.

            They absolutely will try though.

        • kaitco@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t think that piracy will get to a point that it will eat into their profits. Most people want whatever is easiest, and doing the basics of torrenting in a way that doesn’t cause drama with the internet provider and then either using some kind of Jellyfin or continuous streaming setup is far beyond “easy” for the general populace. In order for piracy to get to the public, it would need to be just as simple as streaming through a TV.

          Folks predicted that Netflix would see a mass exodus when they cracked down on account sharing and they actually increased accounts instead.

          Piracy will definitely continue its upswing, but it is more likely that the majority of people will just watch whatever is available on maybe one or two streaming options or just slowly return to just broadcast TV or even cable. Piracy didn’t kill television when the VCR was invented, and it didn’t kill music when the first iterations of Napster and such first became known. Piracy will always be present, but it has a lot of hurdles before it really makes a dent in corporate bottom lines.

          • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Already is as easy as streaming. There’s a site that I won’t link directly called movie web. Takes 15 seconds to search for what you want to watch and cast to your tv

      • Brkdncr@artemis.camp
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m ok with YouTube. I pay for a large music service and get no YouTube ads.

        Every other service has only made things worse. Netflix has done the least by not yet pushing ads.

    • GeneralVincent@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      52
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      A lot of these streaming companies are just cable companies who needed to change their business to keep up, but don’t want to change their predatory practices

  • Tinnitus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    117
    ·
    1 year ago

    I canceled my subscription right after I got that email. I don’t use it enough anyway. I’ll just sail the high seas if a new show that I want to watch ends up there.

    • jballs@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s what happened to me too. I got that email and was like “oh shit, I’m paying $16 for HBO and I can’t even get 4k?” Cancelled.

        • averagedrunk@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          I didn’t notice Atmos was gone until now. I have an ok Atmos system that works pretty great on the titles that support it. I love Atmos.

          I get it free with my Internet service so I’m not cancelling, but I’ll never subscribe.

      • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Right? Who’d want to pay 16USD a month for DVD quality video? You’d get more value digging out of the Blu-ray Bargain Bin once a week.

    • Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s more like “thanks and goodbye“ and maybe a little bit of “don’t you dare show your face around these parts if you know what’s good for you” sprinkled in for good measure.

  • LazaroFilm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    74
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I really don’t want to have to go back to torrenting, but it seems that’s the only option if they keep pushing like this. I’m a camera operator, I work in the industry, my livelihood depends on movies being made. But racketeering the viewers is not how you’ll sustain an industry. Sure it’ll raise your quarterly report but it will damage your business deeply. Producers are cutting themselves a slice bigger every day, both from the viewers and the workers (look at the writers and actors strikes). We can’t make art in a system dictated by instant guaranteed returns and viewers aren’t stupid enough to pay hundreds of dollars to watch the same low effort shit over and over. The film industry NEEDS TO CHANGE!!!

    • kamen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      1 year ago

      The film industry NEEDS TO CHANGE

      Agree, and I’d add that it’s not just the film industry. It’s mostly the same shit all throughout entertainment industry as a whole. Take video games for example - each year there are assumingly AAA titles coming out half cooked at release and yet they cost more than they ever have. Thank you very much, I’d much rather just wait a year for you to fix all those bugs and I’ll buy the game at 80% off if it’s any good.

      • LazaroFilm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        I blame it on investors quarterly reports. Movies and games take years to make. For a movie is usually 1-2years pre production 2-4 months filming 1-3 years post production. So you will see a net loss for all this time. Same with games. It’s years in the making but they want quarterly returns not possible.

        • kamen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well, what do they expect? Of course there won’t be much (if any) revenue before release. If you built trust in the audience that you ship quality products from day 1, maybe more people will preorder, but the way it is now it’s rather the opposite.

          • LazaroFilm@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yep. But the divide between the people providing the funds and the people making the product is very real.

    • thesilverpig@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      I also work in the industry, light tech, and I went back to torrenting like a year ago. Feel pretty good about it. I actually had a paramount plus subscription that I cancelled after working on a paramount show. Fuck those guys.

  • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Don’t worry, I’m sure they’ll increase the price to make up for it.

  • Weslee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I solved it by cancelling and getting a raspberry pi, installing Plex media server, and just pirating the movies and shows I wanna watch

    • Spunky Monkey@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I did the same thing but went with LibreELEC+Kodi. And it even works with the TV remote.

        • Spunky Monkey@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m using pi+libreelec+kodi.

          Why kodi over plex? No special reasons, kodi does everything I need and with the addons support it gives me a lot of options(torrents+streaming).

          Have been using kodi since it was called xbmc in the OG xbox modding scene. Never used Plex, so I just went with what I knew.

          • eric@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Ohhhh I had xbmc like a decade ago, before I gave up on the aye matey lifestyle, so I’ll probably choose that over plex as well. Thanks for the info. I’m looking up libreelec now, but I was just assuming it was some other hardware solution in my last comment.

            • Spunky Monkey@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I had xbmc like a decade ago, before I gave up on the aye matey lifestyle

              Same thing here.

              I was just assuming it was some other hardware solution

              Yeah I though so. LibreELEC is a Linux distro with just enough OS to run kodi.

                • Spunky Monkey@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I’m using a rpi4 model B 4GB.

                  Works pretty well for my needs. At least until now I don’t feel like it’s underpowered.

                  It plays 4K video from my main PC with no problems or stuttering. But I mainly use it for 1080p.

    • spader312@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Just curious is a raspberry pi powerful enough for streaming on multiple devices in 4k? Thinking of doing a setup and sharing with my family and friends. I anyway have a pi available

      • CmdrShepard@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’ll only work if you can direct play everything and depending on your ISP upload speed, you may need to transcode any remote streams in which case a Pi will probably burst into flames. A comparable option would be a micro form factor office PC like an Optiplex with a recent gen Intel processor. The iGPU in these works great for transcoding.

        If you want something more serious you can do a custom built PC with a Fractal Design case (Define 5, 6, 7 or Node series) which are made to hold a ton of 3.5" drives. Again here all you really need is a newer Intel CPU and SATA ports (and/or an LSI SAS card).

        • spader312@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Yeah sounds like it might be a fun project to try it out with a pi but it’s not realistic for sharing outside of my household

      • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, but only via direct play, it’s not going to be doing any transcoding at all watchable level.

      • holycrapwtfatheism@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I host anywhere from 1-6 streams at a time on a custom built server… I’d doubt you’re going to get what you’re asking without a much bigger build. It doesn’t take a crazy build for plex but if you ever need transcoding the pi can’t do it. My most recent iteration was ~$1300 but the price was mostly storage.

      • threegnomes@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        From my understanding pi doesn’t have the greatest hardware for streaming so I wouldn’t trust it for multiple devices at 4k.

  • Send_me_nude_girls@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    1 year ago

    “New Features” ah yes. Actually it’s an upgrade to a new features plan. They are doing you a favor. The new plan is completely free and you even gain streams from other platforms, also free. Yarr!!!

  • restingboredface@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    1 year ago

    This totally sucks, though I have to say I am impressed that they spelled it out so clearly. I can’t believe they showed it to you like that instead of burying it in some legalese/fine print, across multiple emails or something

      • PurpleTentacle@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Do you mean hardware encoding, because that’s what’s paywalled in Plex.

        I personally migrated from a Jellyfin ecosystem to a Plex with Lifetime Pass one when building my current server - while both are highly capable media servers, Plex has, by far, the better clients.

        • BitsOfBeard@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes, it’s been a while since I made the jump, I misremembered. I also found the Jellyfin apps to work better than Plex on my LG TV. Plex was so slow in comparison. Things might have changed since then, though.

        • Lem453@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You migrated to a closed source for profit app to get away from the enshittification of streaming companies?

          You don’t believe Plex will go down a similar path?

          • PurpleTentacle@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            You are aware that this isn’t a lifelong commitment, right? A Plex license doesn’t make using it mandatory. In fact, had you read a bit further, you’d have seen that it’s no commitment at all, and I’m still running and maintaining a Jellyfin server simultaneously, reverse proxy and all. Not just as a fallback, but also for the things it still does better.

            I migrated my household use to Plex, though, because this evil “closed source for profit app” offers an on-device user experience that is as good, if not better, than that of a commercial streaming services. This makes the rest of the household use it happily, instead of seeing it as an inferior alternative.

            Jellyfin’s user experience is simply not there yet, not even close. Its clients, if available at all for the system in question, are (mostly) functional, but certainly not fun.

            I had the money to spend on the evil “closed source for profit app” and it made my family’s life a little better for it - are you sure that trying to shame me for that was the right reaction?

          • PurpleTentacle@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Jellyfin requires a reverse proxy or similar to be reachable from outside the network, once that’s set up, the usability gap between the two becomes a lot smaller. And Jellyfin does, still, have some benefits over Plex - first and foremost: it doesn’t require an active Internet connection and an “ok” from a central server to fully function - it also has fewer restrictions when it comes to sharing content and a better plugin ecosystem.

            Again, I think both are highly capable servers and I’m running both in parallel, even after migrating most of my personal use to Plex.

            It’s the clients where it all falls down, sadly. Jellyfin’s are, even after all these years, clunky, ugly and unpleasant. The choice of supported devices and systems is also quite limited. This is where Plex shines: they have a, generally excellent, client for pretty much everything you would ever want to play your media on.

            • byrona@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              To be fair there are workarounds to getting Plex to play locally without Internet (I had to look this up because I didn’t believe you lol) but you have to set it up on the server with internet… I originally started with jellyfin but it was too clunky for me overall, Plex was way more elegant. Also I’m pretty sure Plex deprecated plugins entirely.

              • PurpleTentacle@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Plex killed their official plugin repository, but plugins are, technically, still supported. There just isn’t much life left in that ecosystem after Plex strangled it.

                Ironically, it’s probably Jellyfin’s thriving plugin-ecosystem that’s holding back its clients - since anything with a native UI can’t really be used with any plugin that extends the UI feature set and vice versa.

                Oh, and all “workarounds” that I know of for “offline” Plex involve essentially disabling user auth for certain IPs - which is insane. Plex simply doesn’t support local auth, it’s not an offline-capable solution. That (and some other restrictions) is why I’m still running and maintaining Jellyfin as a fallback.

                • byrona@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  That’s true, I’m considering having jellyfin spun up for local playback just in case now. Thanks

      • CosmicTurtle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        I moved over to Jellyfin because to pay for Plex Premium just to be able to stream my own videos was too much.

        • killeronthecorner@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          The Jellyfin app is much faster for me on TVs too. Plex was always chugging like it was trying to load too many thumbnails at once. Jellyfin doesn’t seem to have this problem.

      • beeb@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Jellyfin never worked great for me on my older tablet and chromecast. Always struggled with either unsupported codecs or just buffering to hell. My plex server is also on somewhat limited hardware and jellyfin could never transcode fast enough, where plex has no issue.

    • tedd_deireadh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Same. It’s been a much more satisfying investment and has made streaming the content I actually want infinitely easier.

    • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m very glad to have been using Plex/Jellyfin for years, since before HBO Max and Disney+ etc were even a thing. It really is a much better experience.

    • holycrapwtfatheism@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Been managing one since about 2014 and increasing/updating… it’s immensely refreshing never dealing with these companies’ garbage “updates.”

    • 9715698@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Hey now, that extra bandwidth for downloading 4k content is really expensive, same goes for buying a third device to stream it on – HBO is really doing OP a favour here by saving them money

      • FunkFactory@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        imagine if any tech company sold a service at a price that’s at least the cost to provide it, that would be outrageous