• Chozo@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    135
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    With this being a free service, I feel like calling it NASA+ is a bit misleading. To me, I feel like the “+” indicates a paid, premium service. If it wasn’t for the title of this post that clarifies that it’s free, I probably wouldn’t have even considered installing the app based on the name, alone.

    Either way, this is great news! I’m probably gonna check this out once it’s available. I wish they’d have a release date, though. The official page just says “Coming soon”.

  • Stamets [Mirror]@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    112
    ·
    1 year ago

    Huh. There’s no geolock on this either? Fantastic. As a Canadian I tend to get blocked from this kind of stuff. This will be super cool. Might even replace my LCARS screensaver after years of use

    • NegativeNull@lemm.ee@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      52
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Ever since Canada created the elegantly named “Canadarm”, NASA and Canada have been besties.

      To say nothing of possibly the greatest Astronaut to fly to the Space Station: Chris Hadfield

    • Chetzemoka@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      The US federal science agencies are generally pretty happy with sharing things. If it’s free to the US public, it’s free to the world and I love that. Best possible use of my tax dollars.

      (We also share weather and hurricane data with the Caribbean countries, for example. None of them could individually afford what the US is doing, so I’m happy we share.)

    • Obinice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m still using a particularly excellently implemented Matrix screensaver from XP, hehe.

      And what’s that (less authentic looking but still great) one for Linux terminals? cmatrix I think?

  • IronpigsWizard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    111
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I posted on Lemmy about needing recommendations for movies to watch on shrooms…and then minutes later stumble across this article.

    Talk about perfect timing, lol.

    This is really starting to feel like a perfect replacement for that…other website.

  • Jackthelad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    NASA+ will be available on most major platforms via the NASA App on iOS and Android mobile and tablet devices; streaming media players such as, Roku, Apple TV, and Fire TV; and on the web across desktop and mobile devices.

    What’s the betting it won’t be on LG’s WebOS though? 😭

          • LUHG@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Usually yes, Plex is slow as shit but honestly iPlayer is still fantastic even on a b7 2017 oled.

            • ABCDE@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              That’s good; it stopped working on my aunt and uncle’s Sony (although I guess it’s a bit old now, it still works well) so had to get them a Fire stick instead.

        • CmdrShepard@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I have a C3 and don’t use WebOS for anything. I have a PS5 and Roku connected to it instead.

      • SeaJ@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Get a streaming stick. The hardware TV manufacturers use to run their OS is generally bottom of the barrel and is sluggish as hell.

      • appel@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Their OLED panels are top notch, so don’t sleep on it. Just get a separate streaming device as the experience on Roku, Android TV and Apple TV is just miles better.

      • thanevim@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        As others have said, don’t buy TVs for their smart features. Just use a streaming stick. They are easier to replace as software changes, and there’s practically no real benefit to ever putting a TV online in the first place.

        Also, LG panels are the best visual quality. You’re doing good going the LG route. Just keep it offline.

      • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Bro just get an external player and don’t worry about the garbage OS built into the screen.

      • slaacaa@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        LG OLEDs are amazing, worth the price. Their OS is also very good compared to other TVs, I used it for years without an outside player. Now I have an Apple TV, which is better, but I still miss the LG’s magic controller.

    • MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I bit the bullet and got a Google tv with Chromecast because webos always gets left behind (and there was no homebrew YouTube alternative like smarttube on it)

        • MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          My tv didn’t allow the exploits that currently exist, i remember trying and failing. That’s why I ended up with just using something externally. Shame, i enjoyed the magic remote

        • maryjayjay@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Edit: I realize from the replies that my point was off base and actually opposite of the debate here. I’m going to leave this in its place, but thanks to the responders that showed me this wasn’t the right place to make the point I was trying to.

        • cjf@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          This would only be true in the US. What about the rest of the world?

          • PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Good question. I think as long as you can already access the NASA app, NASA TV (it’s on YouTube, too), and NASA’s websites, then this should be no different. IIRC one press release said they wanted to share their content “with the world”, so it sounds like that’s a yes, but again I’m not 100% sure. Hopefully we find out in a few days :)

    • gapbetweenus@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Most NASA stuff is published under non affiliation free use license - you can do what ever you like with it.

    • Alteon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I wouldn’t be surprised if a majority of the content is already freely downloadable from somewhere…

  • Sygheil@lemmy.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    *Previously on Desperate Spacewives…

    Sam has just kicked out of the airlock apartment by his wife Karen. Would his other woman save him from radiation and lack of oxygen? Tune in to this episode of Desperate Spacewives

  • Obinice@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    25
    ·
    1 year ago

    If it’s called NASA Plus, how is it free? The “plus” means it goes a step beyond their free content and into a paid tier.

    Don’t get me wrong this is absolutely fantastic I adore NASA and space, but they’re just be some hidden cost? Otherwise it wouldn’t be a streaming service called NASA Plus, right?

    • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      78
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The “plus” means it goes a step beyond their free content and into a paid tier.

      Notepad++ enters the chat

    • ChewTiger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t think everyone sat down and agreed to that being what plus means. It’s like labeling food as organic, it means nothing. It’s just a name. Odd thing to obsess over, you’ll get nowhere trying to understand marketing people, just let it go.

      What they are adding is a more condensed experience accessing NASA content and making it easier for casual viewers to access. The more people paying attention to science the better. I think this is a fantastic move from NASA

        • Rodeo@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Compared to the standards for organic in civilized countries, that’s basically nothing.

        • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          You realize I can slap the word organic on anything, and it isn’t using the certified organic label… right? Want some “organic ATX motherboards?” I gotchu.

          • PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I like how confident you are about your answer.

            However, perusing the USDA website one comes across this set of “strongly” worded guidelines:

            “Can a product be labeled “organic” without being certified? If you make a product and want to claim that it or its ingredients are organic, your final product probably needs to be certified.”

            “If you are not certified, you must not make any organic claim on the principal display panel or use the USDA organic seal anywhere on the package. (see exemption below)”

            “You may only, on the information panel, identify the certified organic ingredients as organic and the percentage of organic ingredients.”

            Apparently, if a company does mislabel its products, it is liable to be prosecuted by the Federal trade commission.

            • thereisalamp@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              If you make a product and want to claim that it or its ingredients are organic, your final product probably needs to be certified.

              That word probably exists in the same article you originally linked.

              But many actually don’t do it which is why they don’t use the USDA certified

      • flerp@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        What do you expect? “We’re not hosting an intergalactic kegger down here!”

    • dbilitated@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      plus just means more I think, they’re adding to their service so it’s “plus”

      just because that’s usually a hook to get you to pay more doesn’t mean that’s now the definition of the word

      • gohixo9650@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        sure. However “plus” means that something is additional to something else. And the question here is what is the basic product that makes this one be the additional

        • 0xD@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          You’re really trying to make this more complicated than it is. Should they just call it NASA? NASA Streaming? NASA VOD?

          It’s just a catchy name.

              • gohixo9650@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                From their generic FAQ:

                What is Disney+?

                Disney+ is the streaming home for entertainment from Disney, Pixar, Marvel, Star Wars, and National Geographic.

                from my limited perspective, the word “plus” is to indicate the rest studios/companies that are included in the Disney (parent) company

            • GreyBeard@lemmy.one
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              That’s actually what it has kinda came to mean. Lots of Streaming services are called “Plus”, even if they don’t have a separate non-free version.

    • luciferofastora@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Did you confuse NSA (American gestapo) with NASA (a bunch of nerds that really like space and use American funds to indulge that passion)?

      • muntedcrocodile@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        1 year ago

        No. Can u remind me again why nasa was invented? Was it something to do with a propaganda war with the USSR and a space race perhaps?

        • SomeAmateur@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Anything a government (or company) puts out can be seen as propaganda. Nobody is going to talk shit on themselves if they can avoid it.

          And yes govt tech usually has a military origin and is part of a race against other militaries. Rocket motors, missile guidance systems, satellite imagery, gps, computers, encryption, the internet. It’s already well underway for AI. Just because they have their start in military application or global competition doesn’t mean they aren’t rad as hell or not worth learning about.

          If you don’t want to watch it, nobody is forcing you to.

    • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Sure, but this one allows some scientific progress rather than civilians massacres.

    • PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Are you not familiar with NASA TV? It’s pretty interesting at times with science updates on their exploration programs like the Mars rovers and JWST. They also broadcast EVA’s and have interviews with people working in Mission Control and elsewhere. I like it a lot.

      • muntedcrocodile@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I am familliar i love it damn cool shit and impressive engineering. Its important that while enjoying it that u dont forget its a tool to promote american propoganda and scientific exeptionalism