Toyota-owned automaker halts Japan production after admitting it tampered with safety tests for 30 years | CNN Business::Daihatsu, the Japanese automaker owned by Toyota, has halted production after admitting it falsified data in safety tests for its vehicles for 30 years.

  • RickRussell_CA@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    149
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Odd that they put “Toyota-owned automaker” in the headline instead of Daihatsu. Or something like, :“Daihatsu, owned by Toyota”.

    Whether the problems go “up the chain” to the parent company is TBD, I guess.

    • cowpowered@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      There’s a pretty good reasoning for this in the article:

      “an independent third-party committee had found evidence of tampering with safety tests on as many as 64 vehicle models, including those sold under the Toyota brand.

      • RickRussell_CA@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        And, presumably other brands that come from Daihatsu plants. Assuming the safety issues are only within Daihatsu facilities, that’s the key information. “Daihatsu, a Toyota subsidiary” or similar conveys the useful information. “Toyota-owned automaker” does not.

        As it stands, it sounds like CNN is trying to vaugely imply that the problem applies to Toyota generally, which obvs will get a lot of clicks from people who own Toyotas. That’s sloppy clickbait.

    • 𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒏@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      1 year ago

      Indeed, even worse consideeing just last week they recalled a ton of vehicles because of faulty airbags, and a month ago issued another recall for 12V batteries catching fire

      • sj_zero@lotide.fbxl.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        There’s always recalls going on, so it’s not indicative of anything when they happen.

        I’ve had 3 newer cars from 3 brands in 3 countries, and all 3 had a recall of some kind. In each case they just bring it in and fix it…

        • bitwaba@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’d much prefer a manufacturer that issues recalls over over one with a perfect track record. No one is perfect. At least one of them is acknowledging and fixing their mistakes.

        • UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s when they don’t do the recalls like Chrysler with their Pacifica minivans. That van has so many problems and the customer ends up paying for the repair. The harness corrosion behind the bumper, The grille shutter, hybrid coolant pump, electric ac expansion valves and I just had one with a crank position sensor code with the hybrid charging system making an awful racket with 9000 miles. Most of the problems I listed are usually under 30k miles. I didn’t even get into their other vehicles. There’s a reason Consumer Reports listed them as one of the most unreliable.

    • zik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Or rather bad press for Daihatsu, who this is actually about.

      The headline is terrible and misleading.

    • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t think it’s collusion as much as not wanting to be the bearer of bad news, which snowballs into a cascade of lies.