Publication: https://drive.usercontent.google.com/download?id=1MZrFRii_nJYdW8RulORB9JveLkCRbncX&export=download&authuser=0

Couldn’t get a translation in place sp asked an AI to answer what is the researchers definition of self harm: According to the report, the researchers define self-harm content as material that shows, encourages and/or romanticizes self-harm. This includes content that:

• Expresses a desire for self-harm
• Shares advice on self-harming behavior
• Shows images of increasingly serious self-harm
• Encourages others to engage in similar self-harming behavior

The self-harm content was categorized into 4 levels of increasing severity:

1. Non-explicit image with text explicitly mentioning self-harm
2. Depicting self-harm without blood
3. Referring to self-harm in both text and image, without blood
4. Illustrating severe self-harm involving blood in both text and image/video

So their definition covers a spectrum from text references to self-harm all the way to explicit visual depictions of serious self-harm acts involving blood. The categories represent an increasing degree of overtness in the self-harm content. ^[1]

I don’t see the connection between Lemmy and Bluesky/reasoning, can you elaborate?

Two Tesla owners walk into a bar. One stops in the middle on the way to the aeat and the other one drives right into a fire truck

That’s some serious spam if it managed to get there too

Articles about this will continue to be posted until moral improves

Some have tactile markings for location reference, like keyboars have

I thought for a sec it was significant

What are these guardrails? It won’t talk about specific topics?

If we can just get it to fail completely that’d be great, if that’ll make him a non billionaire

In X’s EU user base report consisting of data from February to July 2023, Musk’s social media platform had 112.2 million monthly active users in the EU. In the following six month period from August 2023 to January 2024, that number dropped to 111.4 million users.

That’s a minuscule drop % wise

Even when AI is given search results it can struggle with anything that’s not simple. Kagi has a search integration and it references the websites, even then I often find mistakes, although much less without it.

I don’t trust LLMs without this integration

No you don’t understand, this one will say it respects your privacy

I thought chrome, yt, search, gmail/docs, android, etc. would all be separate entities, making them less willing to share data for financial reasons

I feel like this needs to be real, not a movie. Not someone who gets killed, just someone who sees their own data

You won’t, it’s a conscious trade off. Some people never put a sim or esim in their phone and have a separate dumb phone for calls, or separate hotspot

This vide explains the trade offs, reason, and approach of havjng a separate device for data: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RyirQOCUUK8

And this guy shares his approach of not having a sim: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Dei2buz1X0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y83BS_mK9GE

I think generally speaking these privacy articles fail to convince the majority of people that there’s a problem, which is crucial to be able to sell the solution.

I think the abortion part is the most relatable, but you’ll hear them say they’ve got nothing to hide. I believe getting access to that data and show people what data they have on them would be the most effective. It’s like saying to someone that has nothing to hide “oh yeah? Give me your phone and your documents, let me browse what’s on them”

I hope Google gets split up, that’ll probably be the beginning of the end for targeted ads (I would hope)

How did they do it tech wise?

Interesting read. There are countries with low crime rates before this technology came to light, facial recognition doesn’t seem to be the right answer for law enforcement. I wish they’d delve in more on the privacy concerns or scenarios that might outweigh the benefits