peedub

From the article:

These references are almost definitely tied to the newly discovered “IoT Enterprise Subscription” edition of Windows 11, not the client version of Windows vNext.

With that said, I don’t think it’s unlikely that the next version of Windows will have some new capabilities that require a subscription to utilize, tied to your Microsoft account and services.

I found it easy to get the front end showing but the backend stuff required a little trial, error, and searching to get sorted. Here’s a part-example of what I needed to make sure the correct traffic was sent to the back end (this is using a yaml file, not inline in a compose file):

rule: "(Host(`domain.com`) && (PathPrefix(`/pictrs`) || PathPrefix(`/api`) || PathPrefix(`/feeds`) || PathPrefix(`/nodeinfo`) || PathPrefix(`/.well-known`))) || (Host(`domain.com`) && Method(`POST`)) || (Host(`domain.com`) && Headers(`Accept`, `application/activity+json`)) || (Host(`domain.com`) && Headers(`Accept`, `application/ld+json; profile=\"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams\"`))"

I also decommissioned mine as I was seeing comments and posts coming up a lot quicker and more reliably on the lemmy.nz instance.

Their paywall is so painful.

I second this. I’m a big fan of homepage. Easy to set up so long as you don’t mind a yaml config file (you can copy and paste the examples if you’re new to the format).

It’s called homepage