I feel like this is a case for framework support. They were better than your generic IT team when I interacted with them. Maybe they have a better idea of what is going wrong.

I feel like this enables the dick putting in process.

Ah that makes so much more sense.

for “private reasons.”

That’s such funny phrasing. Why not say like a misguided effort to protect better against covid.

From experience, older thinkpads usually sell for cheap, come with an inbuilt monitor, and are built sturdy. Highly recommend.

There is actually a whole subsection of AI focused on training one model with the output of another called knowledge distillation.

And, idk how, but I ended up reading the entire thing.

Why are tax dollar being spent making it a little faster for rich FiDi people to get to JFK. Take the A train like the rest of us.

There is so much infrastructure NYC could improve:

• Biking Infrastructure
• More subway routes in Brooklyn
• Better ties to PATH and LIRR
• Expanded and more reliable bus infrastructure

And that is just what I can think in the moment.

I think there is levels of trust.

I am often able to reach of level of trust to believe a company is not straight up lying about the code they are running on their servers.

I am not often able to reach a level of trust to believe a “trust me bro” from a company (especially if that statement is not qualified in a meaningful way).

Just read through their faq

Some of the messaging community believes that software that is open source is more secure. It is our view that it is not.

That’s a nope from me.

I think my love of the font comes from how comfy everything feels. A lot of nice curves 😉.

I like hack. I use it for everything.

Imagine spending $400 for 24GB of ram.

Sincerely, another Framework user

Maybe because of centralization? The article is fine though.

But…I kinda agree with the downvoters. I think federation is the real way to create safe spaces for people. Centralization just does not seem like the way.

Having a minority founder doesn’t inherently mean the site will be safe. Everyone has biases and prejudices.

This looks like it’s from the aifund thing he is a part of, but it seems like they took that part out. I have never worked for of those companies so idk 🤷‍♂️.

Imo, Andrew Ng is actually a cool guy. He started coursera and deeplearning.ai to teach ppl about machine/deep learning. Also, he does a lot of stuff at Stanford.

I wouldn’t put him in the corporate shill camp.

Ya, okay that is understandable.

To be honest I have never tried a wasm reversing challenge. I may need to give it a shot.

I completely agree.

However, I still would rather have all the websites I visit pass through my browser’s api than be making straight syscalls.

I think it’s not perfect security but a good line of defense.

Hmm i guess I just haven’t spent enough time trying to parse unminified js.

I still would think though, if the code is simple enough to understand when you unminify the js, equivalent code should be similarly simple to understand if it’s wasm passed through IDA.

I’d argue that having a sandbox that can run binaries with a limited and customizable feature set is actually a good thing for the web. I think there are more technically competent solutions, but the fact that WASM is available on virtually every machine and os, makes it pretty powerful.

If implemented right WASM might speed up our web apps, keep the browser sandbox that is actually quite nice, and run on pretty much any machine. If they open sourced the code, that’d be even better.

Between minified js and WASM, I think I’d take WASM (I can’t understand minified js anyway). Between a pure html site and WASM, I think I’d take the pure html site (but I don’t think we will be living in that world anytime soon).