

Sure, any software could be better. The question is, is it useful as-is and how does it compare to other language tooling? Is it fine, or do we need to really focus on getting it up to par?
Mama told me not to come.
She said, that ain’t the way to have fun.
Sure, any software could be better. The question is, is it useful as-is and how does it compare to other language tooling? Is it fine, or do we need to really focus on getting it up to par?
This is not a private enterprise running out of someone’s garage
Neither is the company I work for. We’re not Amazon, but we handle billions of revenue, our users have very high risk jobs, and they are using our software more and more to do these high risk jobs. We have a lot of controls about how things get released (QA team, and every change is tested before and after deployment), we just use our source control to handle the actual deployment.
Whether it’s sloppy depends on their processes (i.e. who validates the change?), not the tools they use.
We don’t use Cloudflare Pages, but we do use automatic deployments, and pretty much anyone on the team can submit a change for deployment. It’ll get reviewed before going live, but that’s a limitation we’ve placed on the tools and process.
For the blind: aliens.
I don’t think the size of the vehicle matters, but where it’s placed. A sufficiently large battery (e.g. something powering a warehouse) is unlikely to be right next to a bunch of important stuff, so they’ll just let it burn out. A Tesla, however, is much more likely to be next to a bunch of other cars, so they need to contain it.
No, penis.
Crowd source your database, what could go wrong?
To be fair, healthcare.gov had a rocky rollout too. No gaping security holes AFAIK though, so this is a new low.
Yeah, my preference for government is to not change. Enforce the laws we have efficiently, and don’t bother me too much. Big changes carry a lot of (usually) subtle carveouts for special interests.
What’s sloppy about it? Plenty of blogs and other static sites work that way. In fact, that’s largely how we do deployments at my company, we merge to a special branch and it triggers a deployment.
The database being open is completely sloppy, but deploying through a source control platform is fine.
Progressivism is the other side of that coin, a belief that we need strong hierarchy with the “right people” at the top to have a functioning society. It’s the same basic idea that we either need or deserve strong leadership.
For some reason those two are being pitched at the only valid ideas, probably because those at the top benefit from people believing that. There are other ideas, they just don’t have that “quick solution” people seem to crave that only comes from top down control.
Just because one side of the coin is bad doesn’t make the other side good. Get a better coin.
I didn’t say it was. I said it’s a similar fetish for hierarchy, just a different kind.
Nice! Maybe I’ll finally give Kagi a shot.
I switched to Tuta for email and calendar and other services for other products. I try to avoid putting too many eggs in a given basket.
Get on it.
Progressives are much the same way, but with different hierarchies. Progressives seem to love big government hierarchies which a strong executive branch enforcing a bunch of regulations.
That’s what you get from a two party system, you get two groups with a fetish for different types of hierarchies.
Reject hierarchy and push for local rule, it’s what we in the box like to call liberty.
What’s up with the username (Nixon Groyper) ? I understand Groyper, but Nixon was a pretty okay president up until Watergate and very much not a Nazi.
I think it would’ve been funnier if the first name was Brandon, Andrew (Andrew Jackson and the trail of tears), or Franklin (FDR and Japanese Internment).
Maybe it’s a serious ad though, but in that case, why pick Nixon?
You can and should have spicy reporting while remaining impartial. It takes more work to drum up the evidence, but that’s what separates good reporting from great reporting.
We’re going to have two vehicles regardless, and that’s pretty common for families and couples. The average cars per household is around 2, and above that in many states.
The Leaf wouldn’t be targeting single vehicle households, but family units where one is a dedicated commuter and the other is a family car.
Are they cheaper? Even over 1M miles or whatever a truck engine is expected to go? And for running a warehouse overnight? I find that hard to believe.
But even if true, you need to take range into account. Hydrogen cars get better range than comparable BEVs, and that would surely add up for a truck hauling a massive load. And as hydrogen scales up, it’ll get cheaper. It’s currently a bit more expensive than gas (about 3-4x), but that’s with hydrogen transported from some plant somewhere. If it’s locally generated from solar, it’ll probably be quite a bit cheaper.
Wow, 14% from Germany? That’s incredible!
Also, 6.4% said they don’t use Rust because the community is unwelcoming, which is really sad to hear, but I’m glad the number is relatively low.
I’m also surprised “disk space usage” isn’t an issue for many. I just cleared out dozens of GB of disk use by Rust, and I had to fix my CI/CD to clear itself properly.
Anyway, interesting results, thanks for posting!