It will be open source, end to end encrypted using Signal’s double ratchet encryption protocol, and he plans to make it easy for fediverse platforms to integrate it. The beta will release later this month.

He’s also the creator of https://fedidb.org btw

    • Dran@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      1 year ago

      Presumably because currently, activitypub doesn’t have a module for secure message exchange that can’t be snooped on by a server admin.

        • diablexical@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          If there’s n of something and n+1 breaks it, then it was broken to begin with.

          • paraphrand@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I find it interesting that people who don’t really think about these things much often have a default sentiment that everyone on a single platform is better.

            It’s especially true of people who just exploit platforms for attention. It breaks the rules they have built up in their heads about how to be important and have status.

            Just kinda thinking out loud here.

            • HughJanus@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I find it interesting that people who don’t really think about these things much often have a default sentiment that everyone on a single platform is better.

              No one thinks that. We just think having everyone on a different platform is bad.

              • paraphrand@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Can you clarify the nuance you are pointing out? I really have heard multiple people assume they will be forced to be on every platform if multiple platforms become active/popular. They express they think a single platform is preferable.

        • ChewTiger@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Competition is good, especially with regards to privacy and cyber security. Customers benefit when companies don’t have a captured market. A lack of competition only leads to monopolies and stagnation.

          If no one offers a secure product, then customers have no choice but to either not use anything or put up with it. Competition means that at any time a newcomer can offer a better product (that is hopefully open source).

          Edit to add: Ideally you could message people on different apps with the same account. But I’ll take fragmentation over a monopoly.

          • HughJanus@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Hard disagree. People actually being able to use apps is good. The smallest amount of privacy and security is a thousand times better than WhatsApp or Facebook Messenger or whatever other Meta garbage people are using.

            Wickr, Threema, Telegram, blah blah blah there’s too many chat apps already.

    • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      Theres reasons to pm stuff. Some used it on reddit for stuff like exchanging adresses for trading tea, sweets, etc.

      • HughJanus@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        There are already hundreds of ways to PM stuff. Why do we need another?

        • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t want to give strangers my personal cell, discord, twittter, whatever handle here publicly. If there is a need to exchange secret informatiom, how will you take this convo elsewhere?

          • HughJanus@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            How is it that your Matrix handle is “personal” but your Sup. handle is not?

            • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I don’t have matrix?

              Anyway: Platform specific handle being “public” is not a problem. What is a problem (to me) is the association with other platforms I am on. No one besides those that actually should know it (hence PM), need to know it.

              Do I reuse my username on many platforms? Sure do.
              Do I need to tell you? Nope brother!

              Also: Why should I take my conversation from here to exchange confidential information than just letting it stay here?

              • HughJanus@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                I don’t have matrix?

                My point, exactly.

                Why should I take my conversation from here to exchange confidential information than just letting it stay here?

                I’ve already answered that.