Three Mile Island was the worst nuclear accident in US history. Was mainly caused by poor design of human feedback systems which caused operational confusion and lead to a catastrophic failure.

    • Usernameblankface@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      If/when the ai hype train crashes, it would already be online and therefore a good argument can be made to redirect the power to the grid instead of the then-defunct project

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        That’s true, but this reactor had been operating for decades, until 2019. Methane was too cheap (and didn’t have to pay for its waste) and made it unprofitable, so they stopped. Presumably the price MS is willing to lock in at makes it profitable for them again. I assume they predict prices going up or they’re getting it cheap.

        Keep in mind, MS has only signed an agreement to buy 100% of the output, not the reactor itself.

    • tee9000@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Maybe true. But if we have increased energy demand it might as well be nuclear.

      Halting ai development might be nice according to many people, but we cant make that happen. Fraud alone is magnitudes more rampant. Its here to stay and we have to deal with it. I think this is a big win.

        • tee9000@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          3 months ago

          This is a pretty fucking stupid comment lmao

          What the hell are you talking about?

          • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            19
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Probably they mean the way “AI” is presented to the public / investors. Most things that claim to be “AI” aren’t, they’re just regular boring ol’ software, and even those things that do use AI are usually just using them for one tiny facet that doesn’t actually require them.

            There’s potential for some incredible advances in AI right now, but outside of some novelty examples we really haven’t figured out what it’s actually useful for quite yet. It’s one of the more interesting questions in the field.

            • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              3 months ago

              Agreed, but the point of the original reply is that AI, like fraud, is magnitudes more rampant and here to stay. For now.

              • tee9000@lemmy.worldOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                And that fraud is specifically rampant because of ai… so if companies arent using ai to combat it then they would never be able to keep up.

            • pimento64@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              If the general bulk of appreciable-quantity tech investors suddenly found out in granular detail what is actually being done with their money as opposed to what they were told, it would probably cause the biggest crash since the Great Depression.