Would it make the internet better? Probably.

  • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    You’d think they’d have more sophisticated remedies than cutting it up. Which won’t improve anything, won’t change the incentives and will eventually put us right back where we started.

    I mean duck manifest v3, but the government abdicated their responsibility for 50 years and now they think they’re going to save us with solutions from 1930 ? Do better you ducks !

          • Mr_Blott@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            In countries where monopolies are forbidden, internet costs about €20 per month

            I’m guessing OP is paying about $80 lol

          • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            It’s a Red Queen’s Race.

            Well, in our country," said Alice, still panting a little, “you’d generally get to somewhere else—if you run very fast for a long time, as we’ve been doing.”

            “A slow sort of country!” said the Queen. “Now, here, you see, it takes all the running you can do, to keep in the same place. If you want to get somewhere else, you must run at least twice as fast as that!”

            • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Well the important thing is to make sure everyone knows it’s impossible to make any sort of positive change, ever.

              Clowns lol

              • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                Whoever said anything about that? You can make positive changes, just don’t expect them to be permanent. Nothing is permanent. That’s life! Eventually we all die.

                • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  If you have a competent anti-monopolistic government, you can make positive change faster than the market makes negative change.

                • rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  This defeatist attitude is immature and unnecessary. Please refrain from posting such negative comments in the future.

        • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          So it broke their monopoly for 20 years? That’s…a lot. Imagine if we had a consistently not corrupt DOJ for 20 years.

            • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              The only thing that would prevent that is the complete end of capitalism. So you’re saying there can be no good things at all, no material increase in standard of living, no wins, nothing, until capitalism is completely replaced?

              • AlexanderESmith@social.alexanderesmith.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                No, you just need to regulate who can merge with who, and when, and why. And not accept bullshit answers from executives.

                You’re just moving the goal-posts because you know you don’t have an actual argument.