Sure, there are always outliers and you can correct me if I’m wrong, but that’s just the overall impression I have.

(I wasn’t sure if !asklemmy@lemmy.world or this community would fit better for this kind of question, but I assume it fits here.)

  • demesisx@infosec.pubEnglish
    5·
    10 hours ago

    It is you, here, who is trying to make politics an absolute war, you’re the one barging into a bar where people are singing the people’s songs and dancing the people’s dances and say “up, to arms! what are you dancing, what are you singing, you need to fight for your right to sing and dance!”.

    I’m doing nothing of the sort. If anything, I’m barging into a bar where they’re in the process of discussing permanently banning anyone that even mentions politics at any non-pre-approved moment and shaming them for it.

    • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.catEnglish
      32·
      10 hours ago

      Tsk, tsk. Upvoting yourself from alt accounts is generally a bannable offense. I’ve reported you.

      Note: You’re not being silenced for your opinion, here. You’re being silenced, if you do get silenced, for your abuse of Lemmy systems. I realize you’re probably going to conflate the two dishonestly, but that’s what happened.

      • Cauê@lemmy.eco.brEnglish
        1·
        10 hours ago

        Tsk, tsk. Upvoting yourself from alt accounts is generally a bannable offense. I’ve reported you.

        Do you have any evidence?

        • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.catEnglish
          2·
          9 hours ago

          https://kbin.earth/m/fediverse@lemmy.world/t/740517/Do-you-think-the-mostly-limited-range-of-political-views/comment/4095945/favourites

          Note the upvote from his alt on programming.dev, along with two suspect upvotes from other @infosec.pub accounts at exactly the same time. The one from @lemmy.eco.br seems like it could be real.

    • barsoap@lemm.eeEnglish
      14·
      10 hours ago

      So… you’re banned here? Why then do I see your posts?

      Cut that victim complex and actually engage with what I said instead of complaining that noone’s listening when you say shit 99.99% of people here already know, providing not solutions but analysis that is so undercomplex it barely qualifies as soundbites.

      You’re not being a revolutionary, here. You’re an angry kid taking their first breath, loudly screaming as to the sudden incursion of the real-world into your sheltered life. Plenty others have been taking breaths for long enough to not be screaming, but scheming. Get to that level instead of having the gall to say “when people ignore me then that must be because they’re billionaires”. Too easy. Suspiciously easy, don’t you think? How many people ignore you, downvote you, how many billionaires are actually on lemmy?

      • demesisx@infosec.pubEnglish
        5·
        8 hours ago

        “Allergic to analogies” should be your username. I’m not reading that insipid wall of text when the first sentence misunderstands my very clear analogy. Of course no one mentioned banning me. Try to follow along.

        • barsoap@lemm.eeEnglish
          13·
          10 hours ago

          You may want to have a look at the definition of “sarcasm” and “rhetoric”.

          I explained, in detail, why you’re getting ignored. You still refuse to engage with the topic. Try to not ignore me, ignore others, maybe then you’ll understand why what you say you simply doesn’t resonate. It takes more than one person to vibe.

            • barsoap@lemm.eeEnglish
              12·
              10 hours ago

              lalalalalalalala I can’t hear you so I won’t respond to your argument (if you even made one)