Article: https://proton.me/blog/deepseek

Calls it “Deepsneak”, failing to make it clear that the reason people love Deepseek is that you can download and it run it securely on any of your own private devices or servers - unlike most of the competing SOTA AIs.

I can’t speak for Proton, but the last couple weeks are showing some very clear biases coming out.

  • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    Here is a general write up about the CEO showing their maga colors.

    More happened in the reddit thread though that added some more elements, like the ceo opting for a new user name with “88” in it (a common right wing reference), his unprompted use of the phrase “didnt mean to trigger you,” him evasively refusing to clarify what his stance actually was because “that would be more politics,” on and on. You can read through that thread here, although proton corporate are mods, so i have no idea what they may have deleted at this point.

    The thread was full of “mask on” behavior that is pretty transparent to anyone experienced with the alt right on the internet.

    • Telorand@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Thank you so much! That was way beyond what I could have hoped.

      I’ll read the link you provided in a bit, but that does sound really bad. Must suck to work at a company you think is helping people stay private only to have the CEO come out as pro-fascism.

      • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        20 hours ago

        No problem mate. The thread is a mess, but if you read the comments below the top pinned one, you’ll see most of the salient points that pissed people off. The “color” i mentioned above came from all over that thread, with some of it deleted. I know he edited/deleted the “triggered” comment when he was called out, but he never expanded on why he claimed the GOP was the “party of the little guy” and why all the “corporate dems needed to be thrown out” to get anything done. He also opted not to respond at all to people asking why he thought the party of tech billionaires was suddenly going to crack down on tech billionaires besides saying he really liked J.D Vance, a tech millionaire whose political run was funded by, get this, tech billionaire Peter theil.

        Dude fawned very publicly over tech billionaire maga, who will do clearly do nothing for privacy and monopoly busting, while pretending that the real issue is chuck shumers and establishment dems.

        The bias is clear and prominent.

        • Telorand@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          19 hours ago

          I wasn’t a customer of theirs (I’m always skeptical of super-popular-anything), but I think I’ll look elsewhere for secure email.

          Not because of this article, which I think makes some decent points, but because I would worry in the back of my mind that the Officers of the company would happily bow to their demigods and start secretly tracking people as a show of fealty.