Discord will switch to temporary file links to block malware delivery::Discord will switch to temporary file links for all users by the end of the year to block attackers from using its CDN (content delivery network) for hosting and pushing malware.

  • darth_helmet@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Eh if they don’t want people using their service that way, that’s their right. People who care about it that much should host a matrix instance.

        • Mirodir@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Ignoring the fact that they were clearly talking in orders of magnitude, it was 8MB for a very long time and only recently got increased to 25.

          • Rentlar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’d only recently noticed the change, because my multipicture and short video sends were failing less often.

        • echo64@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Fine, free gets you 20 floppy disks worth!! Omg, so useful. Four second heavil compressed reaction mp4s might fit fine. Don’t go more than ten.

          If I’m measuring it in two handfuls of floppy disks in 2023, then its not a lot. That’s your hint that I’m measuring it in !980s technology.

          • LufyCZ@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            There’s no daily limit mate, you’re free to upload as many files as you want.

            Just not at once.

    • lostmypasswordanew@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      This is typical enshittification. Make an impossibly good service to gain marketshare. Then make it worse once you’ve eliminated all competition and dominate the market.

        • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          If their plan was to intentionally make unsustainable investments and then gut features later on, they should be shuttered now before they waste any more users time and money

          • diprount_tomato@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Initial investments are usually excessively big to secure your position. The main focus isn’t to balance the budget, but to have as many earnings and growth as possible to then get rid of the defficit

            • echo64@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              You are describing enshitification. You’re missing the point.

              Company enters market, disrupts it with money from investors, with featuresets that aren’t profitable just to drive out the competition, kills the competition who have to pay for their features and pricings with an actual business, then raise prices and reduce features now you’re the only one left.

              See music streaming, food delivery, taxies, TV and movie streaming, now game subscriptions are gonna do the same thing. Discord is another example .

    • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Did anything about my comment imply I thought this change was illegal? This has nothing to do with their rights

      The issue at hand is taking away a feature your users have come to expect from your product after youve secured a level of dependance by outcompeting the competition

      • darth_helmet@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I didn’t intend to imply that, my statement can be rephrased as “if users don’t like this change, they should use an alternative, because discord is going to do what makes sense to discord.” File hosting is ubiquitous and cheap, so it isn’t a big deal. I don’t work at discord, but I do work at a company that has file hosting as one of its features, and combating malicious misuse of that feature is expensive and a pain in the ass. If I could get away with not offering file hosting, I’d be tempted to remove it.

        • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Do you think your company could get away with offering a paid service that included file hosting, and then suddenly announcing that the file hosting was now only temporary?

          Or would you expect your customers to abandon you over any claims of “just find an alternative”?

          E: to clarify, by “your company” I mean where you work. Im not assuming youre at a position of ownership

          • darth_helmet@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            The services are way too different to compare that feature in isolation, unfortunately. But discord’s business model is not to be a cdn, and I think it’s a good move to occasionally prune a feature that doesn’t provide enough juice for the squeeze. We’ve seen much worse enshittification this year, and I doubt this move has any measurable effect on their active users. Dealing with getting your servers off of blacklists because some douche decided to host malware on your free file hosting isn’t how anyone wants to spend their days, I assure you.

            • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Its not going to effect the causal, non paying active users for sure.

              But thats because they arent the paying customers. A lot of people who paid did so for the purpose of upgrading their personal servers, which pretty often included the file storage.

              Im not in a ton of servers, but the ones who were community hubs are already discussing leaving discord over this, because the file convenience was the big draw of paying for discord. No idea where they want to move to, but they arent happy about sitting still.