• Synthead@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Firefox isn’t an “alternative browser.”

    I didn’t think Google would play the evil card, but don’t trust the ad blocking abilities of software made by an advertising company, I guess.

    • kubica@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      What do you mean by not an alternative browser?
      Are you trying to say something about the word choice or…?
      Chrome is an alternative browser to Firefox too.

      • 14th_cylon@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        34
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        yes, i think he is speaking about the word itself. it is terrible that it is gaining negative connotation… like when people say bullshit like “alternative facts” or “alternative medicine” and the word itself slowly starts to look slightly suspicious just because it is used by morons.

    • barsoap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      Of course it’s the alternative. Has always been, even before it was called Firefox: Netscape Navigator is the alternative to Mosaic. Fun fact: Internet Explorer was a fork of Mosaic. All of Chrome, Edge and Safari are descendants of KHTML.