• lazynooblet@lazysoci.al
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    You compared cheapest by cheapest, however items cost is more efficient with larger sizes

    If you compare the best GB per $ sizes of both media types it is likely going to much more apart.

    • Tja@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I compared cheapest per TB. The HDDs were most efficient at 18TB, the SSDs at 2 or 4 TB.

      • lazynooblet@lazysoci.al
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh I see. I need better reading comprehension.

        When I do the same calculation I come up with HDD being 4.5x cheaper per TB.