• daellat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        How can any human made art be more derivative than ai art that’s impossible

      • Hadriscus@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        39
        ·
        11 months ago

        No, that’s fact. AI-generated images aren’t art. They’re hallucinations without meaning or purpose.

        • Chee_Koala@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          11 months ago

          Just because some creator (or in your words hallucinator) did not intend meaning, does not prohibit or somehow prevent any beholder to still derive or instill meaning. Your weird comment is also art. The webpage or app we are viewing it on is art. Remember this?. The definition you use may suit you personally, but words are for communicating with others, and to most others it’s definition will be crucially different than yours. Consider adjusting your view or the words you use.

        • Nommer@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          11 months ago

          Stupid opinion. If I ask AI to draw an image, that has no meaning or purpose? So if I did the exact same thing with a pencil then it’s suddenly art? AI is just a tool and people like you need to get over it or fully commit and say anything digital isn’t art because a computer really did it. Anything made in Photoshop can’t be art according to you because a program made it. Blender renders aren’t art because a computer generated it. All you did in either case was tell it what to do.