The US Department of Justice and 16 state and district attorneys general accused Apple of operating an illegal monopoly in the smartphone market in a new antitrust lawsuit. The DOJ and states are accusing Apple of driving up prices for consumers and developers at the expense of making users more reliant on its iPhones.

  • UristMcHolland@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    253
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    9 months ago

    I don’t hate Apple but I do hate their influence. They release some wireless earbuds and then suddenly all the manufacturers “don’t have enough room for a headphone jack”, …get the fuck out of here.

        • r_se_random@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          28
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          9 months ago

          Ehh, that’s ok. Slide out keyboards aside, having an on-display keyboard is a better idea by and large.

          • my_hat_stinks@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            27
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            A keyboard without tactile feedback is objectively worse than a keyboard with tactile feedback, excluding other factors.

            I’ve never had a physical keyboard lag out then send an entirely different keystroke because it thought I held a button, or send a single keystroke because I was typing too quickly.

            I’ve never had to wait a moment for a physical keyboard to show up after selecting a text box.

            I’ve never had the entire layout of a page shift to make room for a physical keyboard whenever I select or deselect a text box.

            I’ve never had a physical keyboard prevent me from using the number pad and force me to use the full keyboard (or worse, vice versa) because of an improperly configured input box.

            The way I see it there are exactly two real benefits to integrating a software keyboard into a touchscreen: reduced physical complexity (the entire device is essentially just one screen), and easier access to emoji. A touchscreen keyboard performs far worse as a keyboard. It’s a valid trade-off for a small mobile device, but it’s not objectively better.

            • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              9 months ago

              I’ve never had a physical keyboard prevent me from using the number pad and force me to use the full keyboard (or worse, vice versa) because of an improperly configured input box.

              It’s all I can do not to contact the web admin when this happens! Two days ago I used a form where the first box was set correctly and the second wasn’t. (Also how about when a site tells your password manager to input the p/w in the email field, uhg.)

              I’ve never had the entire layout of a page shift to make room for a physical keyboard whenever I select or deselect a text box.

              Pretty rare, no?

              I’ve never had a physical keyboard lag out then send an entirely different keystroke because it thought I held a button, or send a single keystroke because I was typing too quickly.

              Might’ve seen that twice in the past year.

              I’ve never had to wait a moment for a physical keyboard to show up after selecting a text box.

              Interesting, just checked and I suppose I kind of wait a millisecond but it’s essentially imperceptible. (Have a pretty new flagship phone.)

              Gotta check reviews on the Clicks now that I think it’s been out a couple months:

            • r_se_random@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              9 months ago

              A keyboard is not just to enter text It can do a multitude of things like emojis. Good luck remembering all the mappings on a physical one, or you end up with having them eat screen space. Might not be your use case, but a vast majority of the world uses it.

              Additionally, this increases the overall screen real estate. Aside for sliding keyboards (which I did add a caveat for in my original comment), a physical keyboard would be in the way for most of the usage an average person makes on the phone, like watching videos, looking at pictures.

              A physical keyboard would probably weight more as well (this is just a guess, based on the idea the membrane, and additional circuitry required for a keyboard would be more than the weight of a glass panel).

              A physical keyboard adds an additional point of failure on your device as well.

              I’m not saying virtual keyboards are perfect. Like any other thing, there are trade offs to make. But in the form factor phones work in, a virtual keyboard makes more sense according to me. The best of both worlds would probably be a sliding keyboard, but that does add more weight to the device.

              • namingthingsiseasy@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                9 months ago

                There’s room for both in my opinion. Keyboards are good for accuracy. Touchscreens are good for custom inputs and slightly faster to type on. In an ideal world, we’d have both.

                To be frank, I find touchscreens so abhorrently useless that I just use my phone less than I’d like to - for example, I’m much more likely to just flat out ignore messages because of how tedious input is on phones. I don’t know if a keyboard would make a huge difference for me since I think mobile devices are garbage in more ways than one, but the lack of a keyboard is by far the biggest issue.

              • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                A physical keyboard adds an additional point of failure on your device as well.

                A hercon keyboard, like in old military stuff, will last far longer than any touchscreen. Its feedback is weaker than for most keyboards, but still better than any touchscreen.

                If we are choosing between a touchscreen alone and a touchscreen plus keyboard, then yeah, only this isn’t a fair comparison.

                A fair one would be keyboard vs touchscreen.

              • Balthazar@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                9 months ago

                To add, I personally have had all of the complaints of digital keyboards happen to physical ones. Just not the removal of the numpad. The others, wordt of which is lag, Ive had plenty. Input lag IS THE WORST.

              • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                Might not be your use case, but a vast majority of the world uses it.

                The breakthrough in ergonomics caused by mass production of stuff for people of different metrics and problems and everything during WWII was entirely about this sentence being wrong.

                A good interface is not for “the majority” or for “the average user”, it’s customizable for all the extremes, so for every user with just a bit of initial effort.

          • daltotron@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            9 months ago

            Yeah, but I like physical keyboards because they’re cool, and non-physical keyboards are lame. They reduce my hardware experience to a joyless, abstracted, sterile experience, where I don’t have the ability to click any buttons, turn any knobs, flip any hinges. Then, on top of that, the software experience also ends up being standardized and sterile.

            It is more practically efficient, sure. But I like the inefficiency. It’s like driving a stick-shift, it’s less convenient, but the tactility and inconvenience, the physicality, makes the object more real, less confined to cyberspace. I am forced to become a more conscious driver, I can’t drink a drink while I drive, or drive one-handed. Old phones are like portable games consoles. New phones are magic mirrors that steal your soul.

            There’s also probably something to be said that there’s a sort of two-way causal relationship, where the phones becoming more practical devices enables more reliance upon them, and phones becoming more practical devices is driven by a need from private interests to make these devices more reliable and frictionless. More joyless. Cars used to be a simple toy and a fool’s replacement for the horse and buggy. In many ways, I would’ve much preferred if they had remained confined to that use case, rather than evolving to take over american civic infrastructure and life.

            It’s sort of like, dwarf fortress has an appeal, not just in playing the “game”, right, not just in doing the things in the game, but also in memorizing the layouts and how to interface with the horrible UI, where it makes you feel smart for understanding how to parse it, even if in reality it’s a fairly useless skill, and it’s not actually that complicated.

    • Ultraviolet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      9 months ago

      Deliberately degrading picture quality when the metadata says it’s from a competitor to push the narrative that they have the best cameras is also pretty low. Points for the sheer audacity, though.

        • olympicyes@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          The proof is the status quo. Video texts from Android users look bad on an iPhone. Apple could choose to fall back to RCS instead of SMS from iMessage. RCS would offer better video quality than SMS, which overall improves the interoperability of all phones. Because RCS is a standard and the natural successor to SMS, refusing to support the standard makes it less likely to succeed, with the intent of defending their dominant market share.

          • pycorax@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            While I agree with you, this isn’t as outright as I though it would be though. Apple fan boys could very easily just handwave this away. Frankly I don’t live in the US so no one here uses iMessage anyways so I don’t really have any examples I have seen or could use to show people.

    • WhataburgerSr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Vote with your wallet.

      I’m one of the few people that use my headphone jack with Grado headphones and have had Motorola phones so I can listen to music the way I want.

      Don’t even get me started on the light green bubble shit.

      Fuck Apple.

    • PlainSimpleGarak@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      24
      ·
      9 months ago

      But that’s not illegal. Apple can’t force competitors to be influenced by them. If Samsung, Google and the like choose to be sheep, that’s on them. I don’t use Apple products. They’re not impacting my life.

      • kaffiene@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        It’s probably safe to assume that’s not the basis for the monopoly claim

        • PlainSimpleGarak@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          9 months ago

          I should hope not. They have about 61% market share in the US. A large chunk to be sure, but hardly a monopoly. With plenty of Android OS manufacturers, there are plenty to choose from.

          • kaffiene@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Did you read the article? Their concerns are a number of anticompetiive behaviours from Apple,. Not the lack of competition. But that said, “Android” is not a competitor, Android is an OS. Samsung is a competitor and they’re nowhere near Apples size in the US

            • PlainSimpleGarak@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              9 months ago

              The Android OS is a competitor to iOS. Yes, Android is produced by several different manufacturers.

              • kaffiene@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                9 months ago

                It’s not a competitor in the sense of a being a company that can monopolise, which is the context of the discsussion

          • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            9 months ago

            According to the article, the main points are:

            Disrupting “super apps” that encompass many different programs and could degrade “iOS stickiness” by making it easier for iPhone users to switch to competing devices

            Blocking cloud-streaming apps for things like video games that would lower the need for more expensive hardware

            Suppressing the quality of messaging between the iPhone and competing platforms like Android

            Limiting the functionality of third-party smartwatches with its iPhones and making it harder for Apple Watch users to switch from the iPhone due to compatibility issues

            Blocking third-party developers from creating competing digital wallets with tap-to-pay functionality for the iPhone

            The enforcers are asking the court to stop Apple from “using its control of app distribution to undermine cross-platform technologies such as super apps and cloud streaming apps,”

            I’m somewhat conflicted. As much as I despise Apple, they have complete rights on their operating systems and thus can tell what they want or don’t want there, kinda like how videogame consoles work. Far from ideal for both consumers and developers, obviously, especially with how Apple hates both.

            As a court case, this sounds dumb and likely to go nowhere. If it was a law proposal that would force them and any future wannabes to open up like PCs, however, I’d be fully behind it.

            • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              14
              ·
              9 months ago

              I seldom argue against capitalism, but this is a good example of runaway capitalism. Apple has been causing a lot of problems and grief. If this isn’t the solution, what is? People are too stupid en mass to make the change we need here.

              • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                As I said in my comment, a better solution would be a law instead of a court case. Even if it sets a precedent, it still leaves all the legal wiggle room needed for Apple, or anyone else, to fuck around in a different manner and get back in the same spot again.

            • PlainSimpleGarak@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              9 months ago

              Agreed. I have no love for the company, but this is government overreach. If Apple users/developers have a problem with any of these items, they have the option to choose another platform.

              Now, if Apple was literally the only game in town, I would probably feel differently.

        • PlainSimpleGarak@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          That’s silly. I own a Samsung phone. Checking email and the weather on it hardly “impacts” my life. Furthermore, you have the option to move to another platform if it bothers you that much. If people don’t leave, that indicates their users are willing to tolerate these issues.

          • prole@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            9 months ago

            Apple impacts your life, if indirectly, by shaping the market that they control over 50% of. I haven’t owned an Apple product since my 4th gen click wheel iPod, and I’d be a fool to suggest that their decisions don’t have an influence on my life.

            • PlainSimpleGarak@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              9 months ago

              Influence and impact are not interchangeable. I would agree they have some influence (indirect) as they affect their competitors and I purchase products from their competitors. They don’t impact (direct) me as I do not use any of their services or products. Apple and I do not have a direct relationship.

              • prole@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                Lol ok semantics.

                “Impact” doesn’t mean “direct” necessarily, that’s why the word is often used with the word “direct” or “indirect” as a modifier.

      • Sjmarf@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        OC isn’t claiming that the shift in the industry is solely Apple’s fault:

        I don’t hate Apple but I do hate their influence

        The reality is that what OC said is exactly what happened. Apple removed the headphone jack to coerce people into buying AirPods. Everyone else released their own wireless earbuds to compete, and also removes their headphone jacks for the same reason.

    • iopq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      20
      ·
      9 months ago

      Actually it coincided with IPX rating for smartphones. The last headphone jack smartphones did not have water resistance, but the newer models did. People voted for a more sealed phone with their wallets.

      These days you can get both, but my phone has a 3.5mm jack and NO ipx rating that I could find

      • gian @lemmy.grys.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Actually it coincided with IPX rating for smartphones. The last headphone jack smartphones did not have water resistance, but the newer models did. People voted for a more sealed phone with their wallets.

        My rugged phone is IP68 but it has Usb C connector and SIM/SD tray, so adding a headphone jack while having an IPX rating seems not impossible.

        • iopq@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          It’s not impossible, they just didn’t do it back then so we ended up in the situation we are in now. By the way, the DAC in my phone is low quality, so I hear popping and distortion when I play

          http://plasticity.szynalski.com/

          at the same time, my phone doesn’t do output to a DAC through USB because it already has a 3.5mm port, so I can’t use something higher quality

          • uis@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            I don’t think DAC is reason behind popping and distortion. Probably shit power circuit or amplifier.

            • iopq@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              It’s both, because I hear little bells in the background even at low volume. An IEM is very sensitive so needs very little power, the amplifier will perform worse as it needs to output more power.

              In fact when I use over ears, it sounds better because I increase the device volume which increases the input voltage

              Anyway, the $9 Apple dongle blows my phone’s 3.5mm jack out of the water. My tablet and desktop have the same issue, but when I connect the same devices to my ancient laptop they sound perfect.

              The point is the 3.5mm jack actually gets me worse sound quality because my phone doesn’t output audio to usb, so I only use it with my TWS. Which, by the way, also sound like crap in the same game, but it might just be Bluetooth issues

      • prole@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        People voted for a more sealed phone with their wallets.

        LOL imagine if capitalism actually worked this way…

        Edit: People seem to be missing the point. I am aware that phones with 3.5mm jacks exist. I also just understand that capitalism and “free markets” don’t actually work the way people seem to think they do. Maybe if the headphone jack was the most important feature to people, it would do better. Or maybe if it was an mp3 player and not a phone. Or maybe, simply, if it was manufactured by a brand people have heard of. Sometimes it’s literally that simple.

        But that isn’t the case, is it?

        • guacupado@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          There are literally phones still around with 3.5 jacks. You just don’t want one.

        • iopq@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          9 months ago

          There are still phones with 3.5mm jacks and they are not the best selling models

          • prole@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            9 months ago

            Maybe people aren’t spending $500-$1200 on a device just because it has a headphone jack. Like that’s anyone’s top concern.

            • iopq@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              Zen phone 10 has everything you need and a 3.5mm jack

              Why isn’t it outselling the rest of them?

              • prole@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                Are you asking me to explain microeconomics to you? Ask 100 people in the US if they’ve ever heard of Zen Phone, and 99 will tell you no.

                And, again, that’s nobody’s top concern. Maybe if it was an mp3 player, rather than a phone, whether or not it has a headphone jack would be higher up on the priority list.

      • lemmesay@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        the 3.5mm rounded hole where you can insert your wired earphones, wired headphones, or stereo speakers

        • exothermic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          Oh, that thing is garbage. I prefer the 6.35mm RGA jacks for superior hi fidelity quality. It’s a shame they don’t make phones with those.

            • exothermic@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              How dare. 6.35mm is superior and I for one want it on my phone. The larger jack size provides a greater surface area for conductance. Why is this important? Glad you asked, more surface area translates to less resistance at the junction, thus allowing more electrons to flow freely from your device to your ocular cavity, where sound is processed from compression waves into electromagnetic waves. The 6.35mm jack is the best option for hi-fi 256 bit color. As you can see, it’s all basic science. Source: I’m a stientist

    • SulaymanF@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      22
      ·
      9 months ago

      That’s not Apple, that’s the free market. Samsung touted wired headphones and a headphone jack and the market still showed they wanted wireless.

      • Raiderkev@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        But we had wireless headphones already. The choice to have both was nice. Not being able to charge and use headphones sucks. Also tiny e waste pods with tiny non recyclable batteries are terrible for the environment compared to a wired pair when thrown in a landfill.

      • prole@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        and the market still showed they wanted wireless

        Or maybe people just need phones and there are only like 3 actual options.

        • SulaymanF@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          That’s simply not true. Have you been in a mobile phone store recently? There’s far more than 3 brands of phone let alone 3 models per brand.