They can both suck an egg.

Self-censorship is the best censorship

Completely legal and definitely not abusing one monopoly to push for another

FINALLY!!!

More like charge money to be called a verified user without actually being verified.

It is, but thats the compromise - less reliability for more comfort. Its not “stupid”, its just a compromise.

ChatGPT is more concise, something wikipedia doesnt excel at by design.

While i agree with them, i do think Microsoft is attempting even worse steps in turning bing/edge into the next google: literally cant open windows help links on any other browser, the task bar’s search functions are bing only, popups about using edge instead of chrome, defaulting 100 file types into edge.

Those big companiew are shit. They all attempt the same stuff while blaming others for succeeding in doing so.

Dude ms defender used to delete my “Hello World” executables built using visual studio just because they were made by an unknown publisher.

Finally someone is fighting those companies that take advantage of controlling the platforms.

So i tried this one and for some reason i cant find candy crush in my start menu. What did i do wrong?

And I am certain the terms will be clear and concise, definitely less than 50 pages and no vague and contradicting statements all over.

I have a strong feeling the terms of usage for this opt-in will include something along the lines of “we can use your voice for our future projects” and then in a few years they will just create podcasts using podcasters’ voices without their true consent and make a ton off their backs while increasing their competition.

Pixel phones are not saints either. They keep pushing google products/servicea down your throat.

Good. Keep cluttering the app until people move to simpler alternatives. Preferably libre.

But the underlying problem here is even bigger than unity’s shitty practices - it means you can change your ToS at any point, at any time, without notice, without the need of consent, and the user has nothing to do about it.

Basically, the user agrees to a certain contract, that the other party can just silently change at any time, and if this is applicable in court, we are screwed.

What if visual studio suddenly added a line in their ToS “we have full rights to any code you ever write in VS” and they suddenly own your 10 years old project? What if android just silently added “we can take pictures of you from your front camera and sell them to porn sites”.

How the hell is it possible you can change the ToS without any notice or consent?

This is true, and the reason people need to stop using social media as their source for news.

When a company has sophisticated algorithms ment to only show you things that will get you engaged - you are not getting unbiased news. Add Meta’s personal agendas on top of that and you get the shitshow that is facebook as a news source.

There are ways to forwards all your emails into a new email address i think. Google it.

Que pecado!

Whats your favorite alternative?

The constant reminders are untoggleable.