Ask Texas how that’s goin.
Ask Texas how that’s goin.
https://www.statista.com/chart/6780/only-5-countries-have-a-bigger-gdp-than-california/
It’s gdp is more that france
Honestly, so long as people keep buying their phones they really don’t care about this kind of stuff. Sure, it was a way to drive up margins for a while, but they will just move onto their next bag of tricks to make it hard to leave.
This can be handled a few different ways.
Provided the pressure is maintained from the outside, mine would work fine with a match.
Give the rapid churn in their code base these days, I’m gonna press X to doubt that.
What’s the watts-per-search of google?
Right? Let’s see this pass rigorous muster first.
Same here. The normal button is the hidden feature that I have to teach passengers to use.
That and insane production budgets. A lot of stream services are dumping hundreds of millions into shows that… Really didn’t need that?
Sorry, I seem to be out of the loop, who’s that and what did they do?
Wikipedia isn’t a social platform. I suspect that their text growth was log(n)
or something of the like. The only new text are things that are literally new or updates.
Lemmy has no cap there. The amount of new text will grow in some proportion to the user base. The more users and more instances, the more text. To say nothing of duplication from cross posting when you get wonky cuts in the federation connections.
None of this is free and it’s going to be a problem if Lemmy grows.
Google is trying to add code to it’s chromium software that would functionally allow for DRM between you and a website. It would be a huge blow to your ability to control ads and what software runs on your PC when you connect to a site.
I have for about a decade. I use my phone as my backup map when I am flying. It has to work, every time, without fail. I’ve never owned an android that could hold a candle to an iPhone for software stability.
People are willing to contribute to well run services. Make the contributions manageable for users and they will happy chip in a few dollars here and there.
That’s what I use personally, I’ve seen the feature elsewhere too.
If I care about the data? It’s on a file system which reports file corruption.
Otherwise? I don’t trust it at all. I back it up and replace the drive when it dies.
Have done years of enterprise fault analysis, I promise you that SMART will happily tell you there is a problem at the same time you begin to experience data corruption. You might get lucky and catch and altered sector count spike up, or a temperature value go out of family, but in the field those things really suck at predictions.
If you want to know if a drive is healthy, track data corruption at the file system layer.
Exactly. We spent four years playing into their hands, its going to take us decades to recover from that mistake.