Making a browser from scratch would be very difficult. SerenityOS has one, but idk how usable it is.

Besides Firefox, I guess the least evil options would be something webkit-based. There are a few of those.

I’m in the 1%

This whole section of the graph will be that invisible part on the left in a couple years. Going up and down is normal as long as it’s trending up.

So basically the boomer queue ensures that cashiers have a job, and it ensures that I don’t have to be treated like a criminal because the cashiers are bagging the groceries and I won’t be subjected to “random controls”. I’m not seeing the negative.

This is going to be a boring answer but I use neovim. I do use it as my ide as well but it’s so fast and lightweight that when I need to edit a random config file or something, I just start another instance of it.

I prefer to composite motion graphics using ed

This coupled with a few years of proton becoming very usable is an interesting mix.

Is this the year?

That’s not an illusion, that just means the bank owns it. I’m not sure what your point is here.

Your argument basically boils down to “never use amazon or any other shitty tech company for that matter”, which I guess I agree with.

Textbook example of the frog in boiling water. No one would have accepted this behavior before, but now we’re so used these big companies doing whatever they want, we have no problem shrugging off whatever they do.

I’m slowly coming to the conclusion that if you’re not actively sabotaging these companies (through piracy at least), you’re morally in the wrong.

In a real free market, the banks would have gotten too big to fail and we would have bailed them out (ask me how I know this)

Serious question, why would you consider Bluesky? I would argue that mastodon is “the” decentralized social media platform, I mean it’s not owned by some billionaire; and if you mostly care about audience size, nothing beats twitter. I’ve never felt any inclination to try bluesky for these reasons.

It’s frustrating since by using your tethered connection you’re using the same data that you already pay for. If there’s a limit on how much data, why does it matter how you use for it?

Don’t you need 2 pairs for phone

No I actually hope that industry becomes infeasible. I hope enough people get off their platforms so they go out of business. That industry needs a complete overhaul.

“Reapply” is rewriting it on the other branch. The branch you are rebasing to now has a one or multiple commits that do not represent real history. Only the very last commit on the branch is actually what the user rebasing has on their computer.

Always merge when you’re not sure. Rebasing rewrites your commit history, and merging with the squash flag discards history. In either case, you will not have a real log of what happened during development.

Why do you want that? Because it allows you to go back in time and search. For example, you could be looking for the exact commit that created a specific issue using git bisect. Rebasing all the commits in a feature branch makes it impossible to be sure they will even work, since they represent snapshots that never existed.

I’ll never understand why people suggest you should default to rebasing. When prompted about why, it’s usually some story about how it went wrong and it was just easier to do it the wrong way.

I’m not saying never squash or rebase. It depends on the situation but if you had to pick a default, it should be to simply merge.

That is absolutely not what rebasing does. Rebasing rewrites the commit history, cherry picking commits then doing a normal merge does not rewrite any history.

Does windows not have the concept of “recents” so you can find things you were just messing with easily

Fuck the wolves

Cuddle the wolves