Looks nice to me. Basing design decisions on contrarianism is silly. If you don’t like it that’s alright. Disliking it because it looks like something else that also looks good is silly.
Looks nice to me. Basing design decisions on contrarianism is silly. If you don’t like it that’s alright. Disliking it because it looks like something else that also looks good is silly.
I think there is something fundamental about the pull of investigating, understanding, and reading that leads to so much crossover between the two.
Gpt4-mini, the model that’s worse at everything but like 100 times smaller or whatever. Really cutting insight you have here.
This is like interviewing the child of a programmer and hiring based off of that.
Next you’ll be making hiring decisions based off of optical illusions and riddles.