4·
2 months agowhat are you gonna do now? i might switch to keepassxc but i don’t wanna learn new stuff.
loathsome dongeater
he/him
a cool (brr) dude
- 0 Posts
- 47 Comments
Joined 5 years ago
Cake day: May 14th, 2020
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
side-tracking
Out of the 800,000 people each year who committed suicide, on average perhaps more capable than the rest of us, what if a few would have been instrumental in developing fusion power?
I don’t like arguments like this. Especially when it comes from someone in the tech field. It seems to imply that climate change is a technical problem and that some silver bullet solution from a savant will solve it. Meanwhile in the real world, the economic and political system has been blowing all the increasing energy capacity on useless stuff like cryptocurrency and now AI.
Maybe rocket.chat?
It’s not how open source works but how venture funding works which is boggling minds here
Git is decentralised by nature. It’s what allows mirroring the repo on other forges even when git repos are hosted on proprietary platforms like GitHub.
What’s matrix 2.0? Are they finally gonna use the go backend as opposed to the python one?
Sorry but no. I have never had this issue.
Can’t say that what you are looking for is common. This is the first time I’ve heard this requirement bring described.
Librejs started a long while back. I’m no js historian but I reckon things have changed a ton in jsland since then. My guess is that there assumption is that since JavaScript files are just scripts, they contain the source code and therefore all it checks for is is the license.
I don’t know at which point things like obfuscation through minification and systems like webpack came along. I’m only theorising but I feel librejs has not been able to keep up with the times.
I take your point. I am not against this project existing and it could turn out positive even. But as I said it doesn’t have the potential to hinder Chrome’s monopoly.
My point is that no one talks about using regulations to curb Google’s browser monopoly ever. Even the anti-trust suit against them was related to their search offering. This relates to how Mozilla is beholden to Google for funding, and other players in the game being big corporations themselves.
politicians won’t do anything
Politicians can be made to do stuff. It is not always easy or even possible but activism sometimes works. Either way it is more likely to work than a toy browser for a niche segment of nerds becoming a viable alternative.
Alright then when the stars align perfectly and this pie in the sky becomes a reality maybe we can seriously consider regulating Google.
But alternatives already exist in the form of Safari and Firefox.
I agree with what you said but there is next to no chance a new browser engine from scratch will be able to challenge Blink’s dominance.
Google’s power comes from a combination of unfortunate factors. They have limitless money to support Chrome’s development. They are one of the biggest vendors of online services. They are one of the biggest drivers of new web standard adoption.
Breaking this monopoly will require regulation and enforcement, not a “tech visionary” and a GitHub co-founder playing hero.
Ladybird
Why is there so much hype around this?
Oh shit this is great
Thanks
Anyone knows if there are third party tools for filling in the metadata of a jellyfin library?
I love jellyfin but I don’t want or need metadata most of the time. For rate occasions when I do, I don’t wanna do it through jellyfin because I don’t find the interface conducive to this.
Can you explain more?
White what you say is true, I feel like this has more to do with their engineers being better at or more comfortable with FreeBSD or something like that.
deleted by creator