Cheaper than a kid!

Why not both!

Depends on what you are using it for.

“The general fair use definition is that fair use is any use of a work that is not done in an effort to profit from the copyrighted work.”

Source

If you don’t own it when paying for it then you aren’t stealing it when pirating it.

What are you saying? We’re not supposed to form ignorant mobs with pitchforks?

Drivers Tend To Kill Pedestrians At Night. Thermal Imaging May Help.

Thermal imaging will definitely help spot those dirty walkers so I won’t miss as many. Those bastards can blend in sometimes and some of them are deceptively quick. The little ones especially are tough to take out. Of course, sometimes those guys just run right in front of you which are easy points but it takes the sport out of it.

Anyway, it’s about time someone put the right tools in the hands of us hunters. I can’t wait to have an evening cruise with my lights off and really get a good stalk on, you know?

I don’t believe that ad blockers modify the user agent, so if you can modify the user agent of FF to emulate Chrome and solve the issue, then that means Chrome users that use ad blockers don’t have to deal with the delay and therefore their claim that they aren’t punishing FF users his utter horse shit.

encode ads as part of the video file

I suspect that an AI could be trained to be able to recognize ads, or at least the most annoying, ads.

Also, a community driven project, like SponsorBlock, where users identify ads to build up a database could be created.

These are just a couple of ideas to defeat embedded ads, and I’m not a genius programmer by any means. This is just another front in a war that has been going on since at least the 90’s and as long as blocking ads is less annoying than watching them, we’re winning.

But what am I going to do while I’m pooping!? Read the news!?

And not even giving them a cut of the profits or helping them in any tangible way? Sure, sure, nothing wrong with that. If they didn’t want to be filmed, they should have stayed home…oh, right.

Sometimes I think that instead of antacid’s, I’m taking crazy pills.

I guess I missed the bit where the company was a bullshit one…because it’s not. Also, the two were romantically linked because they watched a Virgin Galactic launch together. Imply that I’m a bootlicker all you want, but that’s a pretty tenuous “romantic” link. Regardless of whether or not he’s banging her, it isn’t fraud. Sorry to burst your bubble.

Criticizing billionaires for dumb non-stories just waters down the real reasons we should be critical of them and makes us look like fools; like PETA criticizing Obama for killing a fly.

Just curious, how is it fraudulent? Who’s being defrauded? Did I miss something?

I think that they’re making perfect the enemy of good…and they can because people keep throwing money at them. Most dev teams don’t have that luxury.

It sounds like you could have always bought the ones that you want!