• fellowmortal@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    79
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 days ago

    I have tried freecad a number of times to replace solidworks as a critical piece of closed source software in hardware development toolchains. I have always struggled. Yesterday someone spent an hour with me at a makespace saying… “FreeCAD has a different way of doing this/try realthunder branch/use symmetry condition/delete all conditions that coincide” … it has been worth years of trying alone. When I started solidworks the reseller gave me a week of training - this is often why complex FOSS software gets a reputation for being clunky, because alone you will spend ages hunting a GUI button in a complex interface.

    TLDR: Go outside, go to makespace or a FREECAD conference - meet other people who use open source software - its much easier to use/learn from others than alone.

    • Damage@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      22 days ago

      When I started using SOLIDWORKS I had 0 training, still managed to make it work. FreeCAD is still frustrating after a lot of effort. But I keep trying, because it’s the only real open source option

      • JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        21 days ago

        Interesting, when I started using FreeCAD I had 0 training, and I have managed to make it work just fine. Was mostly frustrated by the topological naming problem, but that is fixed now.

        You can do quite complex things with it.

        You just have to put in a bit of effort and think in an additive sketch-extrude workflow. But yeah, not easy to transition from solidworks.

    • Mex@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 days ago

      The best thing about 1.0 is that it has ported most fo the topalogical fixes from realthunder!