• thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      20 days ago

      It’s hard but not impossible, as even ‘retail displays’ run an OS in the background to control input switching, image settings etc.

      Honestly the best thing to do is buy whatever TV you want (we have a couple of the LG OLEDs in our household), and don’t ever plug them into your network (or WiFi). Otherwise, with updates OS and apps become sluggish, with more ads crammed in.

      Instead, use a seperate media player (e.g. Apple TV if you’re already on the iOS ecosystem, Nvidia Shield or similar for Android, HTPC if you’re so inclined etc.) - they’re more powerful, arguably more secure & private, and portable between displays if/when you upgrade.

      • coolmojo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 days ago

        Unfortunately EtherNet over HDMI exists so your your TV can still access the Internet if the Apple TV or Nvidia Shield has Internet access. To prevent that you have to make sure use older HDMI cable less then HDMI 1.4.

        • Majestic@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          19 days ago

          Never been implemented. It doesn’t exist.

          Cables support it but zero devices made it to the consumer market and both devices would need to support it for it to work. It’s a dead standard from another era at this point. WiFi speeds have become so significant that there’s just no reason for the additional costs that would be involved.

          I admit if half of the people out there who bought smart TVs started refusing to connect them to the internet and bought streaming boxes instead there might be an incentive for TV makers to try it but no incentive for streaming devices to help them do it and at that point it’s just easier for TV makers to require an internet connection or the TV doesn’t work.

    • capital@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      19 days ago

      You’ll see these marketed as monitors sometimes, from what I’ve seen. Mostly it’s for businesses but if you want a dumb screen to connect things to, it might be called a “monitor” even if it has the form factor of a TV.

      • 0x0@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        20 days ago

        Please enable internet access to setup your new TV, otherwise no TV for you.

        • teft@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          25
          ·
          20 days ago

          Then you turn around and return it. Don’t encourage that behavior by just letting it happen.

          • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            20 days ago

            If your retailer has a generous enough policy to let you return an opened TV because simply because you don’t like it. I spent $1,200 on a Sony TV with backlight bleed issues that were so bad that half the screen was tinted blue. I tried to return it or get a replacement but was told by both the retailer and Sony support that half the screen being blue was “normal for LED TVs and within acceptable parameters” and to go fuck myself.

            • teft@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              25
              ·
              20 days ago

              That’s what chargebacks are for. You don’t have to rely on shitty retailers return policy.

              • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                15
                ·
                edit-2
                20 days ago

                You’re not going to win a chargeback determination in this case either.

                You will be, as I was, shit out of luck.

                • teft@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  29
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  20 days ago

                  If your credit card doesn’t let you do a chargeback for defective equipment then you need to get a better card provider.

                  TVs not working after purchase would qualify as defective in my opinion.

            • Petter1@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              ·
              20 days ago

              In my Country, you can Return within 1 month if you are not satisfied.

  • ftbd@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    20 days ago

    FYI for those using DNS-based adblocking: I discovered that my AndroidTV box asks 8.8.8.8 when my local DNS server blocks a request.

    • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      20 days ago

      Block all port 53 traffic from your network outside of your DNS server/pihole itself.
      Block all known DoH servers.

      If you want to get REALLY fancy you can write a NAT rule that will force any outgoing request on port 53 to route to your dns/pihole.

      I do all of this. It’s actually funny to see the requests that were hardcoded to go somewhere. Giant fuck you to those companies.

        • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          19 days ago

          Yes. But there are lists of well known IPs that are serving DoH. So you can just block those. Obviously blocking 443 is not a good idea.

          • Goun@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            19 days ago

            Damn, never digged into that I thought blocking the DNS port would be enough, thanks for the information.

    • addie@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      20 days ago

      What a shower of twats. Don’t block the request in that case, just redirect it to your local server that returns a 1x1 transparent png for all requests.

    • wrekone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      19 days ago

      Depending on your router you can forward all request on port 53 to your DNS server regardless of the IP they try to use.

    • stupidcasey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      19 days ago

      I always have issues with dns blocking so I tried something sneaky I redirected all DNS requests to 1.1.1.1/1.0.0.1 and it worked brilliantly, for about a month when it stopped working all together, I don’t know if a cache was wiped or google saw what I was doing and made a special exception just for me, obviously I want to believe I’m a special snowflake taking the world’s largest internet company head on in an epic battle of wits and skill but I think the cache thing might be more likely for some reason.

      • ftbd@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        19 days ago

        You mean redirecting on your router? How should google stop you from doing that? And why would you redirect to cloudflare lol

        • TORFdot0@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          19 days ago

          It could start using DNS over HTTPS if it had enough failed requests. Those wouldn’t be able to be redirected

      • sanguinet@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        20 days ago

        I wouldn’t mind doing it. I run my own DNS so it wouldn’t affect me, but I figure if they’re already trying 8.8.8.8 they may as well try 8.8.4.4 and perhaps more, so it’d require a bunch of firewall rules.

        Now, all of that is moot point cause I hate the whole “smart TV” thing, so they’d never be connected to the internet.

      • ftbd@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        20 days ago

        I set up my firewall to block all outgoing traffic to ports 53 and 853 (except for the upstream traffic from my pihole). I suppose DoH could still sneak through though.

    • S_H_K@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      20 days ago

      I connected an old laptop with linux mint and put the TV always in HDMI mode. Problem solved.

  • MrSoup@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    19 days ago

    Ehm, it is already like that. Most of smart TVs use Android which is under Google control, a big (if not the biggest) ad company.

  • BroBot9000@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    20 days ago

    Don’t ever connect them to the internet. Period.

    If it’s required, buy a different tv. It’s not difficult to look that up beforehand.

    • Alphane Moon@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      20 days ago

      I suspect in the near future it will be impossible to buy a TV without spyware/adware. The only option will be to not connect it to the internet and run your own Raspberry PI/SBC based solution.

      • BroBot9000@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        20 days ago

        Monitors aren’t being pumped full of this stuff and so won’t the premium televisions.

        The super budget/sold at a loss TVs will absolutely be gutted for spyware.

        • Alphane Moon@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          20 days ago

          Monitors aren’t being pumped full of this stuff and so won’t the premium televisions.

          I have a feeling premium TVs won’t escape adware/spyware either. They can get their margin on the hardware and earn some more money on spyware; I don’t see what incentive they have to not do both. I hope I am wrong though.

          • thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            20 days ago

            You’re not wrong, there are a number of videos from Louis Rossman (right to repair advocate) on YouTube lambasting LG for doing this very thing on their high-end G-series OLED TVs; including defaulting to opt-in to marketing and providing PIR data after an automatic update.

        • Redredme@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          20 days ago

          Looks at the top of the line Samsung Odessey 49"/54" ultrawide monitor. Looks at specs. Reread this comment.

          Uhuh

      • slumberlust@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        19 days ago

        If I worked for the manufacturer I’d just piggy back on other TVs networks to communicate. Wouldn’t work if you live in the country but for everyone else I’d just need a similar brand within wifi range.

    • Ⓜ3️⃣3️⃣ 🌌@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 days ago

      Checking before buy buying will be possible for computer and privacy « educated » people only, that leaves almost everyone helpless in the real world, in a store facing TVs all playing the demo video. Maybe some will read Amazon reviews or do actual research… hope.

  • FluffyPotato@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    20 days ago

    I have an old 60 inch 1080p TV from the early days of smart tvs. It has a built in app for plex and youtube, a remote that works as a pointer, it’s insanely slow but it has zero ads and I’m never ever getting a newer model.

    • mrvictory1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      18 days ago

      Same here, one of our “smart” TVs needs Ethernet for networking, the other needs a Wi-Fi dongle. Rest aren’t even smart. All 1080p.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 days ago

      Yup. My 58" 4k LG TV has a bunch of apps (we only need Netflix and Jellyfin), and the only ads I’ve seen are in their apps, which don’t need to be opened. It’s a little slow and apparently can’t even handle Jellyfin over HTTPS, but it works well.

      My SO wants a bigger TV, and I’m dreading looking through the current market to find a decent replacement. I’d really like OLED and for it to be a few inches bigger, but it seems everything has ads and spyware out of the box. Screw that…

    • ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      19 days ago

      Getting increasingly hard.

      I finally learned why those 50" tvs are so cheap, like $200. Buy a dumb TV that’s the same size is easily 5x the price.

      Then again, nobody needs a TV and I only bought one during the pandemic, then connected it to my pi hole.

      • qyron@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        19 days ago

        If you manage to have access to AliExpress, you can have it shipped.

        When that is not an option, a big computer screen and a tv card.

        • DampCanary@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          19 days ago

          Aliexprees is great for low buget electronics,
          but I’m skeptical about anything larger.
          Plus with EU’s hike on tarifs and delivery services quality it’s like playing worst type of gambling.

          A TV card(and PC obviously) with screen could be for me,
          but there is no way my parents would agree to such setup.

          • qyron@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            19 days ago

            Amazon ships the exact same fare of electronics. If it serves of any consolation…

            If you have a laptop, there are small USB tv tunners available. If not, a smarphone can access a good deal of content. And depending on what country you are, you might have access to your national channels (open signal ones) over the net.

            For the rest: Aaaaarrrr, me ladies! May the Great Flying Spaghetti Monster fill our sails and set our course for rich waters!

      • qyron@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        19 days ago

        People smarter than me have already had that discussion in the thread and after some heated arguments the consensus is that smart TVs have been caught actively searching for same manufacturer hardware and open wi-fi networks to access the web and call home.

        So…

        • stephen01king@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          19 days ago

          So don’t connect anything from the same manufacturer to wifi and check if any of your neighbour has an open WiFi network, then? I’ve checked my neighborhood and hasn’t seen any open networks just yet, so I’m lucky.

          • qyron@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            18 days ago

            Lucky of you, then. If not, what could you do? Go door to door asking your neighbours to close their wi-fi?

            • stephen01king@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              18 days ago

              That might not actually be a bad idea. Telling them their open WiFi is easily connected to from outside might finally push them to put in some form of network security. Shouldn’t be too hard unless you have a bad relationship with them.

              • qyron@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                18 days ago

                If that opportunity arises, please try and come back to tell us how it went.

                • stephen01king@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  18 days ago

                  LMAO, that would be an interesting story to tell. Unfortunately, for now, all of my neighbours are at least technologically proficient enough to put in a WiFi password, or at least not stupid enough to not let the ISP technician add it during installation.

  • nshibj@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    18 days ago

    What’s with the clickbait title?

    This is not news, it has been happening since Smart TVs started being a thing.

    One of the most common TV OSs is AndroidTV / GoogleTV. Google is the biggest ad company in the world.

  • 0x0@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    20 days ago

    Now all you need is a built-in camera to prove Orwell was right… only off by a few decades, really.

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    19 days ago

    “A convicted felon and sex offender wants to control your next country”

  • GHiLA@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    20 days ago

    normal people can’t just… grab a single board PC and… install Linux on it! What are they supposed to do!?

    I dunno, suffer, I guess. Pass the keyboard. I’m feeling Friends.

    edit: my cousin and his wife came over about four months ago and saw we used a keyboard and the TV was just a computer and he went “why the fuck haven’t we just done that?”. He doesn’t know know Linux, but he has a Steam Deck and got by alright.

    Sometimes, they just need the idea, a little push.

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 days ago

      For a lot of people it’s a good use that’s the difference. I’ve been fucking around trying to set up home assistant for a year when I have time (yeah idk I know it’s supposed to be plug and play but it isn’t for me), but my wife and I were talking this morning and she’s the computer person and once we live somewhere there’s a smart thermostat she’s probably going to set it up because at that point it’s worth the effort, and if she didn’t at that point it would be worth me dedicating the consistent effort to make happen. What you’re describing is similar. If I see it I might try it if not doing it is inconvenient